2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Social Identity Questionnaire for Sport (SIQS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
35
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Social identification with athletes’ teams was assessed using the nine-item Social Identity Questionnaire in Sport (SIQS; Bruner & Benson, 2018)), which was adapted from Cameron’s (2004) social identity questionnaire. Three items pertained to each of the three dimensions: ingroup ties (e.g., “I feel a sense of being ‘connected’ with other members of this team”), ingroup affect (e.g., “I feel good about being a member of this team”), and cognitive centrality (e.g., “In general, being a member of this team is an important part of my self-image”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social identification with athletes’ teams was assessed using the nine-item Social Identity Questionnaire in Sport (SIQS; Bruner & Benson, 2018)), which was adapted from Cameron’s (2004) social identity questionnaire. Three items pertained to each of the three dimensions: ingroup ties (e.g., “I feel a sense of being ‘connected’ with other members of this team”), ingroup affect (e.g., “I feel good about being a member of this team”), and cognitive centrality (e.g., “In general, being a member of this team is an important part of my self-image”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants responded using a seven-point Likert-type scale ranging from one ( strongly disagree ) to seven ( strongly agree ). In evaluating the psychometric properties of the SIQS using three independent samples, Bruner and Benson (2018) suggested that if the substantive research question centers on social identity as a global construct, then a unidimensional approach can be empirically and conceptually appropriate. Consistent with the purpose of the current research, all items were aggregated to create a global measure of social identity strength.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were always told that the majority of group members chose the same name they did, which would be their group name for the study. They then completed a pre‐task measure of social identity strength (Bruner & Benson, ) by indicating their agreement with six statements (e.g., “I feel strong ties to other members of this team”; α = 0.89) on a scale from 1 ( strongly disagree ) to 7 ( strongly agree ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tenure). Social identification strength with one's club sport team was assessed using the nine-item Social Identity Questionnaire for Sport (SIQS; Bruner & Benson, 2018). Items reflected perceptions of ingroup ties (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%