Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3160504.3160574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Performance of Wearable Tecassist Device using Aural and Tactile Feedbacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also in this landscape, smart wearables, such as smartwatches, smartglasses, and digital jewellery, represent the fastest-growing technological innovation for mobile users (Menear, 2020), providing new functionality and services complementary to the prevalent smartphone (Chen, Chen, Liu, Chen, and Li, 2021;Sani, Boos, Yun, and Zhong, 2015), but also likely to replace smartphones in the foreseeable future. Mobile and wearable devices enable a diversity of output modalities for users, from primarily visual feedback on smartphones and smartwatches (Matulic, Ganeshan, Fujiwara, and Vogel, 2021;Wenig, Schöning, Olwal, Oben, and Malaka, 2017) to aural feedback for devices worn on the head (Brezolin, Santos, de Lima, Zanella, Rieder, and De Marchi, 2017;Casamassima, Ferrari, Milosevic, Rocchi, and Farella, 2013) to haptic feedback for fitness trackers and electronic rings (Han, Han, Annett, Anderson, Huang, and Yang, 2017;Turmo Vidal, Zhu, Waern, and Márquez Segura, 2021;Vatavu, Mossel, and Schönauer, 2016). However, the choice of the output modality also depends on the context in which such devices are used and worn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in this landscape, smart wearables, such as smartwatches, smartglasses, and digital jewellery, represent the fastest-growing technological innovation for mobile users (Menear, 2020), providing new functionality and services complementary to the prevalent smartphone (Chen, Chen, Liu, Chen, and Li, 2021;Sani, Boos, Yun, and Zhong, 2015), but also likely to replace smartphones in the foreseeable future. Mobile and wearable devices enable a diversity of output modalities for users, from primarily visual feedback on smartphones and smartwatches (Matulic, Ganeshan, Fujiwara, and Vogel, 2021;Wenig, Schöning, Olwal, Oben, and Malaka, 2017) to aural feedback for devices worn on the head (Brezolin, Santos, de Lima, Zanella, Rieder, and De Marchi, 2017;Casamassima, Ferrari, Milosevic, Rocchi, and Farella, 2013) to haptic feedback for fitness trackers and electronic rings (Han, Han, Annett, Anderson, Huang, and Yang, 2017;Turmo Vidal, Zhu, Waern, and Márquez Segura, 2021;Vatavu, Mossel, and Schönauer, 2016). However, the choice of the output modality also depends on the context in which such devices are used and worn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Técnicas de avaliação são aplicadas para relatar e tratar aspectos de usabilidade. Nesse contexto, Brezolin et al (2017) avaliaram duas versões do protótipo de um dispositivo vestível chamado "Tecassit", que é capaz de detectar obstáculos através de sensoreamento. Com isso, puderam concluir que as configurações da tecnologia dependem bastante da realidade do usuário.…”
Section: Usabilidade Em Dispositivos Vestíveisunclassified