2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.0c00689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Performance of the PC-SAFT and CPA Equations of State on Anomalous Properties of Water

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(189 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PC‐SAFT and CPA are not able to predict the density anomaly. In fact, these two models are not able to predict any of water's anomalies 3 . On the other hand, TIP4P/2005 69 and iAMOEBA 55 are able to predict a density maximum and they predict water's density almost perfectly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…PC‐SAFT and CPA are not able to predict the density anomaly. In fact, these two models are not able to predict any of water's anomalies 3 . On the other hand, TIP4P/2005 69 and iAMOEBA 55 are able to predict a density maximum and they predict water's density almost perfectly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…ADPC‐SAFT represents a vast improvement over standard applications of PC‐SAFT. Tsochantaris et al 8 recently published an extensive review of PC‐SAFT parameter sets for water. The percentage deviations of ADPC‐SAFT are generally 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than those observed for a wide range of PC‐SAFT models 8 …”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PC‐SAFT has been extensively 7,8 applied to the pure component thermodynamic and phase behavior of water. Tsochantaris et al 8 recently published a detailed study examining the accuracy of several literature PC‐SAFT parameter sets for the description of pure water. The results clearly demonstrate that PC‐SAFT is inadequate as an equation of state for the prediction of pure water properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was illustrated elsewhere that the SAFT-type models for pure water are generally inaccurate, because they cannot incorporate the complex structural features present in the water liquid phase. 45,145,146 Surprisingly, Figure 7 shows that both PC-SAFT and COSMO-RS did not provide the worst total RMSLD for aqueous systems. For PC-SAFT, however, there is a large outlier in terms of RMSLD constituted by the aqueous solubility of GSF (see Figure 6), but this can be attributed to the description of GSF itself and its HB acceptor behavior, as discussed in the previous section.…”
Section: Performance With Respect To Individual Solvents and Their Fa...mentioning
confidence: 93%