2018
DOI: 10.1061/jtepbs.0000166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Operational Footprint of Alternative Diamond Interchanges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the previous studies, intersection analysis models generally fall into three categories: simulation models, empirical models, and analytical models. Simulation models are useful in the initial feasibility analysis of new types of intersections which do not have Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures and in comparing them with current intersections [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Empirical models rely on field data to develop relationships between geometric design features and performance measures such as capacity and delay [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the previous studies, intersection analysis models generally fall into three categories: simulation models, empirical models, and analytical models. Simulation models are useful in the initial feasibility analysis of new types of intersections which do not have Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures and in comparing them with current intersections [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Empirical models rely on field data to develop relationships between geometric design features and performance measures such as capacity and delay [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%