Evaluating the Mental Models Approach to Developing a Risk Communication: A Scoping Review of the Evidence

Abstract

Risk communication is fundamental in ensuring people are equipped with the knowledge needed to navigate varied risks. One generally well-regarded framework for the development of such communications is the mental models approach to risk communication (MMARC). Developed during the 1990s, the MMARC has been applied to a range of health, technological, and environmental risks. However, as yet, we know of no attempt to collate and review articles that evaluated communications developed using the MMARC. This article took a first step at addressing this gap by conducting a scoping review that aimed to begin to explore the fidelity with which the approach has been applied, explore whether there appeared to be sufficient studies to warrant a future systematic review, and identify future research questions. Although the initial search found over 100 articles explicitly applying the MMARC, only 12 of these developed a risk-related communication that was tested against a control (and thus included in the current review). All studies reported a positive effect of the MMARC versus control communication for at least some of the outcome measures (knowledge being the most prevalent). However, there was wide variation between studies including type of control, outcomes assessed, and only five studies reported adopting a randomized design. The review highlights both the need for greater fidelity in the way future studies operationalize the MMARC approach, and suggests that a full-scale systematic review of the MMARC literature appears justified, especially given the possibility of a large gray literature in this area.

Using the CAUSE Model to Understand Public Communication about Water Risks: Perspectives from Texas Groundwater District Officials on Drought and Availability

“…More work should be done to understand constituents’ communication and media use habits and preferences, and how potential drought and water availability risks may be communicated to motivate awareness and comprehension among affected audiences. One common approach to understanding what relevant publics want and need to know in risk contexts is mental models analysis . Mental models analysis has been used in risk communication research to diagnose knowledge gaps and misconceptions that risk communication efforts might address in order to increase understanding of risks .…”

Psychological factors that determine people's willingness‐to‐share genetic data for research

“…A large body of evidence from other areas of research suggested that the imbalance in knowledge between experts or stakeholders and consumers might lead to different conclusions regarding risk perception, benefit perception, acceptance and behaviour . For some potentially beneficial innovations, knowledge provision had proved successful to reduce risk perception and improve acceptability . However, innovative technologies and applications are not necessarily judged by weighing the risks and benefits and considering objective facts by either experts or lay‐people .…”

“…[31][32][33][34] For some potentially beneficial innovations, knowledge provision had proved successful to reduce risk perception and improve acceptability. 35,36 However, innovative technologies and applications are not necessarily judged by weighing the risks and benefits and considering objective facts by either experts or lay-people. 37 Frequently, risk judgements and decisions are influenced by previous experiences, effects or other readily available factors to reduce cognitive load.…”

Environment and Human Health: The Challenge of Uncertainty in Risk Assessment

“…"Mental models" have been suggested as a means to integrate community and professional perspectives into an effective communication strategy [98]. But there is no reason why this approach should be limited to communication only.…”

“…It provides the underpinning rationalisation of decision-making and should provide a fair and equitable environment, moving closer to a more sustainable use of developed space. "Mental models" have been suggested as a means to integrate community and professional perspectives into an effective communication strategy [98]. But there is no reason why this approach should be limited to communication only.…”