Evaluating the investment feasibility and industrial implementation of changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing concepts

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a decisions support tool that can be applied in initial stages of design, for evaluating the investment feasibility of changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing design concepts, based on future demand predictions and their uncertainties. A quantitative model is proposed, which evaluates the discounted value of capital and operating costs of changeable manufacturing design concepts, based on essential characteristics regarding their type and extent of changeability. Design/methodology/approach Quantitative empirical modeling is applied, where model conceptualization, validation, and implementation are central elements, using two Danish manufacturing companies as cases. Findings The applicability of the model is demonstrated in the two case companies, highlighting differences in type, extent, and level of feasible changeability, as a result of differences in product and production characteristics. Research limitations/implications Further studies of changeability implementation should be conducted across industrial fields in order to generalize findings. Practical implications There is currently limited support for the conceptual design phase of changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing, where critical decisions regarding type, extent, and level of changeability must be made, regardless of high degrees of uncertainty about future demand scenarios. Originality/value This paper expands previous research on design for changeability and reconfigurability, by explicitly considering changeability as a capability that can be enabled in various ways for various purposes in different industrial contexts. The proposed model and the case implementations provide important knowledge on the transition toward changeability in industry.

Evaluation of Reconfigurability in Brownfield Manufacturing Development

“…Prasad and Jayswal [23] presented a configuration tool for part family selection through the use of a similarity index, average linkage cluster (ALC) algorithm, and measures for reconfiguration effort. Andersen, Brunoe, Nielsen, and Bejlegaard [24] evaluated configuration of reconfigurable manufacturing system during the concept phase through economical evaluation to provide decision support. Haddou Benderbal, Dahne, and Bentoucef [25] assessed different configuration to find the optimal configuration based on the modularity of the system.…”

Towards an Industry-Applicable Design Methodology for Developing Reconfigurable Manufacturing

“…Overall, there are two domains covered by literature; these are: (i) the design and (ii) the operations (and management) of such systems. Examples of research on RMS design include design methodologies [9,10], economic evaluation of reconfigurability [11,12], design of reconfigurable machines [13], reconfigurability characteristics and their implementation [14], and identification and modelling of platforms as a foundation for reconfigurability [15,16]. Operational issues include process plan generation for reconfigurable systems [17,18], configuration selection problems [19,20], reconfiguration management [21] and scalability planning [22,23].…”

The Italian Flagship Project: Factories of the Future

“…Complex and variable market demands combined with the technological evolution of products and processes lead to the need of factories that are able to react and evolve themselves by exploiting flexibility [28], reconfigurability [29], changeability [30][31][32], and scalability [33] to stay competitive in dynamic production contexts [34].…”