2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the impact of urban morphology on rooftop solar radiation: A new city-scale approach based on Geneva GIS data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular note recently is the growing interest in urban distributed photovoltaic power generation. Scholars combine GIS with UBEM to evaluate the PV potential of buildings (Boccalatte et al, 2022;Montealegre et al, 2022), paving the way for sustainable urban development.…”
Section: Urban Building Energy Consumption Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular note recently is the growing interest in urban distributed photovoltaic power generation. Scholars combine GIS with UBEM to evaluate the PV potential of buildings (Boccalatte et al, 2022;Montealegre et al, 2022), paving the way for sustainable urban development.…”
Section: Urban Building Energy Consumption Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density metrics used include BD, Sd height , average neighbourhood building height (ANBH), average building perimeter (AP), and envelope-to-roof surface area ratio. Boccalatte et al (2022) proposed a general GIS-based methodology that explored the impact of building height, building distance, building footprint, total floor area, mean building volume (MBV), volume-to-facade ratio, FAR, and the number of neighbourhoods on the rooftop overall shading rate at a city-scale. The density metrics that were common to most of these studies were BD, SC, and PR.…”
Section: Density Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions between urban morphology and solar energy have been increasingly acknowledged [1]. Solar cadastres have proliferated over the past decade in many cities [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they generally focus on roofs and still few consider facades [3]. Most of the current tools and approaches to model the solar potential on facades are generally limited to the level of specific buildings or a group of buildings, but few consider the scale of city [4].This is explained by a methodological and technical approach that is complex to implement, in particular due to two aspects: (1) the reliable modelling of the reflected component, which is significant on vertical surfaces but also complex to process in a reasonable calculation time [5]; (2) the increased level of detail and more accurate characterisation of the texture of the facades, which enables the identification of the parts that can be valorised by solar panels (excluding the glazed surfaces or the balconies for example).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%