Evaluating the Impact of Two Dialogical Feedback Methods for Improving Pre-Service Teacher's Perceived Confidence and Competence to Teach Physical Education Within Authentic Learning Environments
Abstract:This novel study investigates the effectiveness of two dialogical feedback methods, peer dialogue assessment and dialogical feedback provided by an academic, when they are used as assessment as learning tools in undergraduate physical education courses. Education students from the University of Newcastle, Australia (n=288), participated in this investigation and completed eight weeks of face-to-face on-campus physical education studies followed by a 3 or 4 week in-school teaching program (~1.5 hrs/week). Stude… Show more
“…This collaborative approach involves coaches in the feedback process to maximise learning and development 41,65. It also extends current practices in educational contexts such as: professional learning communities research,66 instructional ‘rounds’,34 and peer-dialogue in higher educational settings 65,67. Following the coach assessment and reflection session, coaches continued implementing MASTER strategies in their normal training sessions and were required to undertake two peer observations of a colleague (using the MASTER observation checklist).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Following the coach assessment and reflection session, coaches continued implementing MASTER strategies in their normal training sessions and were required to undertake two peer observations of a colleague (using the MASTER observation checklist). Feedback and professional dialogue between the coach and the peer observer followed the peer observation sessions as this has shown to be an effective and well-received learning strategy for use in the context of delivering sport and physical education sessions 41,65,67. To facilitate open discussion, coach peer-evaluation discussions were not recorded or analysed in this study; however, this may be a useful process to show potential growth or development over the intervention phase in future studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALT was determined as the percentage of participants actively engaged within each activity as a function of the time allocated for the activity (e.g., 2/14 x 20mins = two players active out of 14 at any point for the 20 minute activity = 0.14 x 20 = 2.8 minutes ALT). The sum of ALT as a proportion of the total time spent in activities (minus the intervention stoppage time) was used as the measure of ALT for a training session.b) Coaches also completed a purpose designed questionnaire (adapted from a questionnaire used in two previous studies involving pre-service teachers in physical education65,67) collecting demographic information (age, experience coaching netball, and assessing: 1) Confidence to coach netball (23 items scale); and 2) Competence to coach netball (22 items scale). Please contact the corresponding author for access to study questionnaires.…”
The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the impact of a novel 8-week coach development intervention (MASTER) on game-based coaching practices of netball coaches from one netball club (n = 16; 8 intervention, 8 active-control; NSW Australia), and player outcomes for the junior athletes being coached. The multi-component MASTER intervention aimed to educate coaches on how to design and implement high quality game-based coaching sessions. The core pillar of MASTER is ‘positive coaching,’ delivered through games-based coaching practices. At baseline and 10-weeks, two coaching sessions per coach were filmed and assessed using the MASTER assessment tool. Players (8-16yrs; n = 85) were videoed during structured gameplay, with three aspects of game play assessed using Game Performance Assessment Instrument. Coaches and players (n = 75; 12-16yrs) completed a perceptions questionnaire. Using linear mixed model ITT analysis, significant interventions effects were observed for the primary outcome: percentage of time spent performing playing-form activities [25.7% (95% CI (7.79-43.65), P = 0.008, d = 1.52]. Significant interventions effects were also observed for coach perceptions, player game skills, and player self-perceptions (P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed for player enjoyment, motivation, or wellbeing. The MASTER program was effective in improving coach and player self-perceptions, and coaching practices of netball coaches during training sessions.
“…This collaborative approach involves coaches in the feedback process to maximise learning and development 41,65. It also extends current practices in educational contexts such as: professional learning communities research,66 instructional ‘rounds’,34 and peer-dialogue in higher educational settings 65,67. Following the coach assessment and reflection session, coaches continued implementing MASTER strategies in their normal training sessions and were required to undertake two peer observations of a colleague (using the MASTER observation checklist).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Following the coach assessment and reflection session, coaches continued implementing MASTER strategies in their normal training sessions and were required to undertake two peer observations of a colleague (using the MASTER observation checklist). Feedback and professional dialogue between the coach and the peer observer followed the peer observation sessions as this has shown to be an effective and well-received learning strategy for use in the context of delivering sport and physical education sessions 41,65,67. To facilitate open discussion, coach peer-evaluation discussions were not recorded or analysed in this study; however, this may be a useful process to show potential growth or development over the intervention phase in future studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALT was determined as the percentage of participants actively engaged within each activity as a function of the time allocated for the activity (e.g., 2/14 x 20mins = two players active out of 14 at any point for the 20 minute activity = 0.14 x 20 = 2.8 minutes ALT). The sum of ALT as a proportion of the total time spent in activities (minus the intervention stoppage time) was used as the measure of ALT for a training session.b) Coaches also completed a purpose designed questionnaire (adapted from a questionnaire used in two previous studies involving pre-service teachers in physical education65,67) collecting demographic information (age, experience coaching netball, and assessing: 1) Confidence to coach netball (23 items scale); and 2) Competence to coach netball (22 items scale). Please contact the corresponding author for access to study questionnaires.…”
The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the impact of a novel 8-week coach development intervention (MASTER) on game-based coaching practices of netball coaches from one netball club (n = 16; 8 intervention, 8 active-control; NSW Australia), and player outcomes for the junior athletes being coached. The multi-component MASTER intervention aimed to educate coaches on how to design and implement high quality game-based coaching sessions. The core pillar of MASTER is ‘positive coaching,’ delivered through games-based coaching practices. At baseline and 10-weeks, two coaching sessions per coach were filmed and assessed using the MASTER assessment tool. Players (8-16yrs; n = 85) were videoed during structured gameplay, with three aspects of game play assessed using Game Performance Assessment Instrument. Coaches and players (n = 75; 12-16yrs) completed a perceptions questionnaire. Using linear mixed model ITT analysis, significant interventions effects were observed for the primary outcome: percentage of time spent performing playing-form activities [25.7% (95% CI (7.79-43.65), P = 0.008, d = 1.52]. Significant interventions effects were also observed for coach perceptions, player game skills, and player self-perceptions (P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed for player enjoyment, motivation, or wellbeing. The MASTER program was effective in improving coach and player self-perceptions, and coaching practices of netball coaches during training sessions.
“…Study participants communicated information that supports the findings within the extant literature. Extensive research has indicated that constant, constructive feedback delivered formally and informally has a positive impact on teachers’ self-efficacy and allows them to make progress in their teaching performance (Akkuzu, 2014; Eather et al, 2019; Memduhoğlu et al, 2017).…”
This study examined the impact school leaders had on the self-efficacy of African American Male (AAM) teachers who matriculated through an alternative certification program. Purposeful sampling was used in this study with four inclusion criteria. The study occurred at a large urban Title 1 school district in the Southeast. The district was selected based on its implementation of an alternative certification program and relative success in recruiting and maintaining a diverse teaching staff. Tschannen-Moran and Hoy’s 12-item teacher self-efficacy survey was administered to select teachers who scored high on their self-efficacy scale. Eleven AAM teachers from various urban school sites participated in this study. Data were collected through one-on-one and focus group interviews. Findings revealed three themes that captured the ways school leaders impacted teacher self-efficacy. Study results can help provide leaders and policymakers with guidance as they seek to address the teaching shortage and develop a more diverse teaching workforce through alternative certification programs.
“…To do so, it is essential to pay attention to the pedagogy of dialogue, actively following up on the future teachers in their first contacts with the classroom. This will allow them to achieve confidence and competence in themselves to create their own professional identity (Eather et al, 2019).…”
Cooperative learning (CL) is one of the pedagogical models that has had more application in the area of Physical Education (PE), being highly worked in the initial training of teachers. The aim of the study is to check to what extent future PE teachers are able to apply in the classroom the PE training they have received at university, deepening their fears, insecurities and problems when carrying it out. Thirteen future PE teachers (7 girls and 6 boys) aged 20.87 ± 1.43 participated and, after having been trained in CL in various subjects, applied it in the classroom during their internship. They were selected through purposeful non-probability sampling. A qualitative methodology was used, being the interviews, the teaching diaries and the seminars with the tutor the instruments of data collection used. Three categories of analysis were used: (a) initial expectations in the application of the CL; (b) problems encountered in its implementation; (c) reflection about its application in the future. The results showed how the future teachers did not see their expectations of success fulfilled, encountering resistance from both students and teachers in PE. Furthermore, they reflect the need to continue training in a model that has infinite nuances so that it can be implemented satisfactorily. It is necessary to continue researching a pedagogical model with so many possibilities in the area of PE and with so much transversality on a social level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.