29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/dasc.2010.5655337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the impact of sensor data uncertainty and maneuver uncertainty in a conflict probe

Abstract: A conflict probe estimates the future separation with other traffic, both for the current state of ownship and variations to this state, using assumptions on how traffic will maneuver. The separation margin between ownship and traffic used in the separation requirements accounts for i) sufficient spatial and temporal margin to restore separation in case it is lost and ii) uncertainty in the current and future position data. Uncertainty in the traffic state data can be attributed to sensor inaccuracies, datalin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computation of these flight path modifications, takes into account the flight dynamics limitations imposed by the aircraft capabilities and possible internal hazards (e.g., hydraulic failure); and 2) a conflict probe which gives pilots options regarding conflictfree paths (tracks and flight path angle) to choose the trajectory options, hazards, and alerts to the flight crew in an appropriate fashion; [8].…”
Section: Integrated Alerting and Notificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of these flight path modifications, takes into account the flight dynamics limitations imposed by the aircraft capabilities and possible internal hazards (e.g., hydraulic failure); and 2) a conflict probe which gives pilots options regarding conflictfree paths (tracks and flight path angle) to choose the trajectory options, hazards, and alerts to the flight crew in an appropriate fashion; [8].…”
Section: Integrated Alerting and Notificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second and more complex, display concept to be studied is the HIM/IAN system's conflict probing function [11] [42] and [10]. This concept provides the crew with a display of hazard regions ahead, along, and near the projected flight path.…”
Section: Flight Deck Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This development of an aircraft weather environment is one component of a larger simulation system. This system includes Integrated Alerting and Notification (IAN) and Hazard and Integrity Monitoring (HIM), initially described in [10]. These two systems were both developed via a NASA cooperative research agreement with Ohio University.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One requirement for the efficient flow of air traffic (without badly impacting capacity) is the accurate knowledge of aircraft positions, velocity and adequate prediction of future aircraft movements. Without accurate information, maintaining safe separation between aircraft requires much more conservative, and therefore less efficient, methods (Roy et al, 2006;Tadema et al, 2010). Moreover, a large scale implementation of these optimised trajectories (i.e., not only for a small set of aircraft but for all those in a dense and complex TMA) remains an issue that will require more levels of automation.…”
Section: I2 Efficiency Vs Capacity In Tmasmentioning
confidence: 99%