2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Impact of Physiological Properties of the Gastrointestinal Tract On Drug In Vivo Performance Using Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling and Virtual Clinical Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After ADME screening, 101 active components passed the combined filtering criteria, which were integrated by human intestinal absorption (HIA), human oral bioavailability (OB) limits of 30% (F30%) and Caco-2 cell permeability. For any drug administered orally, HIA is an essential prerequisite for its apparent efficacy ( Jereb et al, 2021 ). OB is the most important pharmacokinetic parameter, indicating the efficiency of drug delivery to the systemic circulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After ADME screening, 101 active components passed the combined filtering criteria, which were integrated by human intestinal absorption (HIA), human oral bioavailability (OB) limits of 30% (F30%) and Caco-2 cell permeability. For any drug administered orally, HIA is an essential prerequisite for its apparent efficacy ( Jereb et al, 2021 ). OB is the most important pharmacokinetic parameter, indicating the efficiency of drug delivery to the systemic circulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ACAT model consists of nine consecutive compartments (stomach, duodenum, two jejunal compartments, three ileal compartments, cecum, and ascending colon) described by relevant parameters (e.g., pH, volume, length, radius, transit time, etc. ), whereat the system of differential equations is used to calculate the amount of drug dissolved and absorbed from each compartment over time. , Pre-surgery simulations were performed using the default ACAT inputs, except for the percent fluid volumes in the small intestine (23%) and colon (0.5%), which were taken from the literature . The additional ACAT model adjustments for post-bariatric patients included stomach pH value (increased from default pH 1.3 to pH 5.0 for post-LSG patients and pH 7.0 for post-OAGB patients), stomach volume (decreased from default 50 to 10 mL, corresponding to 20% of the pre-surgery gastric volume), and stomach transit time (decreased from default 0.25 to 0.12 h , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 Pre-surgery simulations were performed using the default ACAT inputs, except for the percent fluid volumes in the small intestine (23%) and colon (0.5%), which were taken from the literature. 45 The additional ACAT model adjustments for postbariatric patients included stomach pH value (increased from optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile; in accordance with the literature data 64 55 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile, in accordance with the literature data 62 clearance, CL (L/h/kg) 6 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile, while keeping the optimized values within the range of the literature-reported data 65,66 0.8 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile while keeping the optimized values within the range of the literature-reported data 53,67 volume of distribution, V d (L/kg) 4 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile, while keeping the optimized values within the range of the literature-reported data 65,66 10 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile while keeping the optimized values within the range of the literature-reported data 53,67 distribution constant, k…”
Section: Ex Vivo Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In approaches to PK studies, the study conducted by Jereb et al (2021) evaluated delayed-release tablet pantoprazole compared to dolutegravir and its impact on the patient's gastrointestinal tract after a meal and in the fasted state. This study used virtual models, with pantoprazole performing better than dolutegravir in terms of bioavailability.…”
Section: Gastroplus™mentioning
confidence: 99%