Evaluating the impact of mobility in COVID-19 incidence and mortality: A case study from four states of Mexico

Abstract

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico began at the end of February 2020. An essential component of control strategies was to reduce mobility. We aimed to evaluate the impact of mobility on COVID- incidence and mortality rates during the initial months of the pandemic in selected states.MethodsCOVID-19 incidence data were obtained from the Open Data Epidemiology Resource provided by the Mexican government. Mobility data was obtained from the Observatory for COVID-19 in the Americas of the University of Miami. We selected four states according to their compliance with non-pharmaceutical interventions and mobility index. We constructed time series and analyzed change-points for mobility, incidence, and mortality rates. We correlated mobility with incidence and mortality rates for each time interval. Using mixed-effects Poisson models, we evaluated the impact of reductions in mobility on incidence and mortality rates, adjusting all models for medical services and the percentage of the population living in poverty.ResultsAfter the initial decline in mobility experienced in early April, a sustained increase in mobility followed during the rest of the country-wide suspension of non-essential activities and the return to other activities throughout mid-April and May. We identified that a 1% increase in mobility yielded a 5.2 and a 2.9% increase in the risk of COVID-19 incidence and mortality, respectively. Mobility was estimated to contribute 8.5 and 3.8% to the variability in incidence and mortality, respectively. In fully adjusted models, the contribution of mobility to positive COVID-19 incidence and mortality was sustained. When assessing the impact of mobility in each state compared to the state of Baja California, increased mobility conferred an increased risk of incident positive COVID-19 cases in Mexico City, Jalisco, and Nuevo León. However, for COVID-19 mortality, a differential impact of mobility was only observed with Jalisco and Nuevo León compared to Baja California.ConclusionMobility had heterogeneous impacts on COVID-19 rates in different regions of Mexico, indicating that sociodemographic characteristics and regional-level pandemic dynamics modified the impact of reductions in mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic. The implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions should be regionalized based on local epidemiology for timely response against future pandemics.

Study on the temporal and spatial relationship between public health events and the development of air transport scale: A case of the Southwest China

“…A multitude of studies had illustrated that population structure, factors mobility, regional connectivity network [5,6], urban hierarchy [7], economic resilience and robustness [8,9], digitalization level and development [10,11], as well as the built environment [12,13], all of them were closely related to and interact with the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Especially, there are many studies proving that regions with high population density and mobility tended to show a higher difficulty in controlling the epidemic [14][15][16]. Therefore, controlling population mobility had once become an essential and widely adopted countermeasure [17,18].…”

A Study of the Impact of COVID-19 on Urban Contact Networks in China Based on Population Flows

“…These research results have concentrated on the analysis of the impact of population flows on the development of the pandemic, as well as the opportunities, challenges and countermeasures for urban development in the context of the pandemic [17,18]. It is commonly acknowledged that cities with high population flow dynamics and high density have found it more difficult to contain the pandemic [19][20][21]. The effect of influence attributed to population structure, occupational composition and density has differed significantly, with traders contributing significantly more to transmission and promotion in comparison to the rest of the population [22,23].…”