Evaluating the impact of midwestern cropping systems on soil health and soil carbon dynamics

Dougherty, Brian; Andersen, Daniel S.; Helmers, Matthew J.

doi:10.2489/jswc.2022.00056

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is possible that ST-IWM might have returned to levels similar to NT-SH after several years without the aid of perennial roots. However, Dougherty et al (2022) have suggested that only slight differences in soil health indicators can be expected within short timeframes, which may explain the lack of significant differences in the Wortmann et al (2010) study. Additionally, the Wortmann et al ( 2010) study used the water stable aggregate sampling method by Cambardella and Elliott (1994), which involves wet sieving soil and combining weights of three aggregate size classes, which could have accounted for different sensitivities.…”

Section: Water Stable Aggregatesmentioning

confidence: 91%

Integrated weed management with strategic tillage can maintain soil quality in continuous living cover systems

McPheeters

Bruns²,

Karsten³

et al. 2022

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maximizing living cover and minimizing soil disturbance with no-till are key strategies in regenerative row-crop production. Although living cover and no-till can increase beneficial soil carbon and water stable aggregates (WSA), annual crops in rotation with perennials often rely on herbicides to control weeds and terminate perennials. Integrated weed management (IWM) reduces reliance on herbicides by employing multiple weed control strategies including tillage and/or cultivation. However, many no-till growers are reluctant to implement some soil disturbance due to concerns about negative impacts on soil health. For that reason, we hypothesized that compared to continuous no-till and standard herbicides (NT-SH), a strategic inversion tillage in IWM (ST-IWM) would result in lower soil carbon and WSA in the year following the tillage event. We also hypothesized that soil carbon and WSA would not differ between the two systems when sampled after cover cropping and 2 years of perennials. We tested these hypotheses within a 6-year, diverse, dairy crop rotation initiated in 2010 in central Pennsylvania in a channery silt loam soil. The systems were compared in split-plots in a full crop entry experiment, where the six phases of the crop rotation were planted every year in a randomized complete block design, replicated four times. We compared the soil health indicators in spring 2010 prior to the start of the experiment and in 2013 and 2019 following inversion tillage (ST-IWM) or herbicide termination (NT-SH) of the perennial forage in the first year of the rotation. We also compared these indicators in the sixth year of the rotation after 3 years of annual and cover crops and 2 years of perennial forage. We sampled at two depths: 0–5 and 5–15 cm for total carbon and bulk density, 0–5 cm for labile carbon and 0–15 cm for WSA. Results indicate that despite initial smaller soil health values in the ST-IWM system following inversion tillage, all properties except labile carbon were similar to the NT-SH system in the sixth year of the rotation.

show abstract

Section: Water Stable Aggregatesmentioning

confidence: 91%