2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2009.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the impact of GC operating settings on GC–FID performance for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, high analytical costs and operational time (21,59), instrument calibration problems (60), effects of sample matrix (56), and impact of GC operating conditions (61) are some of the challenges of the method (see also Table 3).…”
Section: Gas Chromatography/flame Ionization Detection (Gc/fid)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, high analytical costs and operational time (21,59), instrument calibration problems (60), effects of sample matrix (56), and impact of GC operating conditions (61) are some of the challenges of the method (see also Table 3).…”
Section: Gas Chromatography/flame Ionization Detection (Gc/fid)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, suberin composition is usually reported in chromatographic raw area percentage and an area‐to‐mass correlation of one is assumed in mass/molar determination balances. This is not sufficiently accurate for a precise monomeric stoichiometric balance since GC/detector response varies with several factors, namely, analyte structure, functionality and dimension as well as with depolymerisation method, work‐up, chemical derivatisation procedures, GC‐methodology and detector used . To date, only a few studies have used calibrations with internal standards (ISs), and even so, some of the standards and/or ISs used offered a low degree of confidence in the analysis because of their structural/physical distance from the analytes or are extremely expensive .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not sufficiently accurate for a precise monomeric stoichiometric balance since GC/detector response varies with several factors, namely, analyte structure, functionality and dimension [53][54][55][56] as well as with depolymerisation method, work-up, chemical derivatisation procedures, GC-methodology and detector used. 53,[57][58][59][60] To date, only a few studies have used calibrations with internal standards (ISs), 17,18,36,42,51 and even so, some of the standards and/or ISs used offered a low degree of confidence in the analysis because of their structural/physical distance from the analytes or are extremely expensive. 18 Thereby, GC-FID (MS) response factors cannot be overlooked and must be determined with suitable standards for all monomers, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of different analytical methods [10][11][12][13][14][15] partially leads to slow method standardization, a long lack of certified reference materials, and differing environmental regulations on which hydrocarbons are to be included in the analysis. 16 Few research focuses on the determination of petroleum oils in sewage sludge samples in past literature. The Chinese discharge standards of pollutants for WWTP (GB/T 18918-2002, China) and only gave the conducted limits in the use of land improvement, but no standard methods for the determination of petroleum oils in sewage sludge samples were obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%