Evaluating the Impact of Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” Self-defense Law on Homicide and Suicide by Firearm

Abstract

IMPORTANCEIn 2005, Florida amended its self-defense laws to provide legal immunity to individuals using lethal force in self-defense. The enactment of "stand your ground" laws in the United States has been controversial and their effect on rates of homicide and homicide by firearm is uncertain.OBJECTIVE To estimate the impact of Florida's stand your ground law on rates of homicide and homicide by firearm.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Using an interrupted time series design, we analyzed monthly rates of homicide and homicide by firearm in Florida between 1999 and 2014. Data were collected from the Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) web portal at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We used seasonally adjusted segmented Poisson regression models to assess whether the onset of the law was associated with changes in the underlying trends for homicide and homicide by firearm in Florida. We also assessed the association using comparison states without stand your ground laws (New York, New Jersey, Ohio, and Virginia) and control outcomes (all suicides and suicides by firearm in Florida). October 1, 2005, the effective date of the law, was used to define homicides before and after the change.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Monthly rates of homicide, firearm-related homicide, suicide, and suicide by firearm in Florida and the 4 comparison states. RESULTSPrior to the stand your ground law, the mean monthly homicide rate in Florida was 0.49 deaths per 100 000 (mean monthly count, 81.93), and the rate of homicide by firearm was 0.29 deaths per 100 000 (mean monthly count, 49.06). Both rates had an underlying trend of 0.1% decrease per month. After accounting for underlying trends, these results estimate that after the law took effect there was an abrupt and sustained increase in the monthly homicide rate of 24.4% (relative risk [RR], 1.24; 95%CI, 1.16-1.33) and in the rate of homicide by firearm of 31.6% (RR, 1.32; 95% CI,. No evidence of change was found in the analyses of comparison states for either homicide (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.13) or homicide by firearm (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99-1.17). Furthermore, no changes were observed in control outcomes such as suicide (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.05) and suicide by firearm (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.06) in Florida between 2005 and 2014. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThe implementation of Florida's stand your ground self-defense law was associated with a significant increase in homicides and homicides by firearm but no change in rates of suicide or suicide by firearm.

Association Between Enactment of a “Stand Your Ground” Self-defense Law and Unlawful Homicides in Florida

“…As in our earlier study, 1 of "unlawful homicide" in addition to the measure of justifiable homicide. We used segmented Poisson regression models, accounting for seasonal influences by using harmonic terms, to analyse each time series.…”

Firearm Deaths in America

“…11,16–25 These prior studies though have focused on either specific laws, brief study periods, specific populations, or specific intents. Instead, the current study evaluates state firearm legislation in a realistic manner by examining the overall, aggregate effects of state legislation throughout an extended, 15-year time period.…”

“…11,16,18–21 Through an in-depth analysis of individual state legislation, Kalesan et al 18 determined that few existing individual state firearm laws were associated with a reduction in FFR. Based on their model, the federal implementation of universal background checks for firearm and ammunition purchases and firearms identification with either micro-stamping or ballistic fingerprinting had the greatest potential to decrease mortality.…”

Improving PICC use and outcomes in hospitalised patients: an interrupted time series study using MAGIC criteria

“…Counts were offset by the natural logarithm of the total number of PICC days per month with robust estimators of variance. Pre–post differences in the rates of inappropriate PICC use between sites (study/control) were tested by including an interaction term 29. Results were reported as incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CIs.…”