2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the impact of data quality on the accuracy of the predicted energy performance for a fixed building design using probabilistic energy performance simulations and uncertainty analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common theme in all these studies is that the sensors used do not have a standardized way of describing the data they produce, even if they refer to the same physical properties. The management of the content and quality of the data produced in Smart Cities and buildings is not standardized, leading to challenges when it comes to their integration, usage and interpretation [13][14][15][16]. In fact, the authors of [17] have proposed that the integration of IoT data in Building Infrastructure Management:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common theme in all these studies is that the sensors used do not have a standardized way of describing the data they produce, even if they refer to the same physical properties. The management of the content and quality of the data produced in Smart Cities and buildings is not standardized, leading to challenges when it comes to their integration, usage and interpretation [13][14][15][16]. In fact, the authors of [17] have proposed that the integration of IoT data in Building Infrastructure Management:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model simulation analyses are increasingly being conducted in many contexts, such as in medical studies on explaining a system or examining how the system will look in the future or how it behaved in past times (See, e.g., Greenberg et al, 2022;Shi et al, 2022;Wallett et al, 2022). The accuracy of the simulation outcomes, however, is a much-debated issue; but there is little doubt that it depends to a large extent on the quality of the input data (Ekström et al (2021), defined here as 'a measure of the condition of data with regard to factors such as completeness, consistency, accuracy and reliability, and whether or not it is up-to-date' (Hassenstein and Vanella, 2022). These were therefore the factors taken into account (in the present critical overview) in compiling the geomedically relevant attributes of Hg, making use of the most authentic and up-to-date sources of reference available as of 2022/2023.…”
Section: Mercury Simulation Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of important studies have recently been conducted on the development of a general model to assess the impact of data quality on the accuracy of model output (See, e.g., Hasan and Padman, 2006;Ekström et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2023). Indeed, as Forbus and Berleant (2022) recently retorted: "A simulation model output is only as good as the data input that drives it, and without taking the time to ensure quality input data, the output may not yield usable results."…”
Section: Mercury Simulation Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%