2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the hydrological response of a boreal fen following the removal of a temporary access road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Track removal did not lead to significant recovery over the duration of the experimental period when comparing the abandoned track to controls for penetrometer and bulk density data. While a study from a fen in Canada found that significant decrease in bulk density, with values comparable to controls, had occurred 3 years after track removal (Elmes et al, 2021) we were not able to conclude, at this stage, that removal of mesh tracks on blanket bog will lead to rarefaction. Our findings suggest that further research into deformation of peat resulting from vehicular usage is required to establish the maximum number of vehicular passes that can be made over a peat surface before plastic deformation occurs, which would build on previous work looking at peat tensile strengths (Dykes, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Track removal did not lead to significant recovery over the duration of the experimental period when comparing the abandoned track to controls for penetrometer and bulk density data. While a study from a fen in Canada found that significant decrease in bulk density, with values comparable to controls, had occurred 3 years after track removal (Elmes et al, 2021) we were not able to conclude, at this stage, that removal of mesh tracks on blanket bog will lead to rarefaction. Our findings suggest that further research into deformation of peat resulting from vehicular usage is required to establish the maximum number of vehicular passes that can be made over a peat surface before plastic deformation occurs, which would build on previous work looking at peat tensile strengths (Dykes, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Track removal did not lead to significant recovery over the duration of the experimental period when comparing the abandoned track to controls for penetrometer and bulk density data. While a study from a fen in Canada found that significant decrease in bulk density, with values comparable to controls, had occurred 3 years after track removal (Elmes et al, 2021) we were not able to conclude, at this F I G U R E 5 Area of failed track in a rutted section.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hydrological connectivity to undisturbed, adjacent peatland ecosystems has been proven the most important factor for the development of peatland characteristic vegetation communities, peat accumulation, and carbon uptake (Lemmer et al 2020;Engering et al 2022;Xu et al 2022). The complete removal of the mineral fill, a common, intuitive approach that is often required by regulations, can create deep water bodies due to the partial inability of compressed peat to rebound after infrastructure removal (Elmes et al 2021). This leads to invasion by aquatic plants such as cattails (Typha latfolia) and the development of non-peat-forming, marsh wetlands (Lemmer et al 2022).…”
Section: Peatland Conservation: Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their carbon storage capacity is another focus of many studies (Yu, 2011;Gallego-Sala et al, 2018;Loisel et al, 2021). Peatland resilience to natural and anthropic disturbances such as drainage (e.g., Menberu et al, 2018;Harris et al, 2020), roads (Saraswati et al, 2020;Elmes et al, 2021), fires (Bourgeau-Chavez et al, 2020;Nelson et al, 2021), and climate change is also of growing concern. According to some climate projections, northern peatlands will experience an increase in vapor pressure deficit (Yuan et al, 2019), resulting in increased evapotranspiration that could exceed that of the surrounding boreal forest (Helbig et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%