2008
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.90617.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the glucose tolerance test in mice

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the optimal conditions under which to assess glucose tolerance in chow- and high-fat-fed C57BL/6J mice. Mice were fed either chow or high-fat diet for 8 wk. Variables tested were fasting duration (0-, 3-, 6-, and 24-h and overnight fasting), route of administration (intraperitoneal vs. oral) load of glucose given (2, 1, or 0.5 g/kg and fixed 50-mg dose), and state of consciousness. Basal glucose concentrations were increased in high-fat- compared with chow-fed mice … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
544
5
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 679 publications
(595 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
24
544
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For body weight measurements, the sample size was calculated assuming a minimum detectable difference of 30% [18] , a desired statistical power of 0.8, and an alpha error of 0.05 for an ANOVA analysis using the sample size calculator from SigmaPlot 12.3 software (Systat Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical analysis was performed through a one-way analysis or a two-way analysis (in the case of time course of blood glucose) of variance (ANOVA) with a Holm-Sidak post-hoc test using the analysis tool from SigmaPlot 12.3 software (Systat Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For body weight measurements, the sample size was calculated assuming a minimum detectable difference of 30% [18] , a desired statistical power of 0.8, and an alpha error of 0.05 for an ANOVA analysis using the sample size calculator from SigmaPlot 12.3 software (Systat Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical analysis was performed through a one-way analysis or a two-way analysis (in the case of time course of blood glucose) of variance (ANOVA) with a Holm-Sidak post-hoc test using the analysis tool from SigmaPlot 12.3 software (Systat Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One day before the end of the experiment, a glucose tolerance test was performed with a glucose dose of 2 mg/kg and a fasting period of 6 h using a FreeStyle glucometer (Abbott Diabetes Care, Almeda, CA, EUA), as described previously by Andrikopoulos et al [18]. At the end of the experimental period mice were anesthetized, blood was collected by retro-orbital punction and the epididymal adipose tissue (EAT) was collected after euthanasia.…”
Section: Physiological and Biochemical Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice were randomly assigned in consecutive order to an SFD or HFD, and to vehicle or AICAR treatment. At week 11, we performed a fasted IPGTT [30] and collected urine for 24 h to assess microalbuminuria and urine H 2 O 2 levels. At the end of the study, WAT and kidney leucocytes were isolated and characterised by flow cytometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in both control and PTG OE mice no significant change in insulinaemia was observed during the IPGTT at zero vs 30 min [1], whereas, under identical experimental conditions in normal mice, insulinaemia peaks at 30 min after i.p. administration of 2 g glucose/kg body weight [15]. In respect of this, Mir-Coll et al refer to a prior publication in which, at least in hepatocytes, PTG modifies glycogen phosphorylase phosphorylation and activity [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%