2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72348-6_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Future of HCI: Challenges for the Evaluation of Emerging Applications

Abstract: Abstract. Current evaluation methods are inappropriate for emerging HCI applications. In this paper, we give three examples of these applications and show that traditional evaluation methods fail. We identify trends in HCI development and discuss the issues that arise with evaluation. We aim at achieving increased awareness that evaluation too has to evolve in order to support the emerging trends in HCI systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Poppe and Rienks demonstrated in their paper that the existing evaluation methods are not appropriate for emerging HCI applications through presenting three examples where traditional evaluation methods fail: GSS, smart phones, and Virtual Dancer Application. Interested readers can consult [36]. There is actually a tendency for natural interaction due to the fact that such interaction is more intuitive for users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Poppe and Rienks demonstrated in their paper that the existing evaluation methods are not appropriate for emerging HCI applications through presenting three examples where traditional evaluation methods fail: GSS, smart phones, and Virtual Dancer Application. Interested readers can consult [36]. There is actually a tendency for natural interaction due to the fact that such interaction is more intuitive for users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, Preece et al define the evaluation as gathering data about the usability of a design or product by a specific group of users for a particular activity within a specified group of used or work context [41]. However, besides the usability, the interaction, between the user and the interface and the user experience come into play [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of usability depends on the users, their needs (goals) and the context -three variables that are inconsistent and unstable in themselves [32]. The focus of HCI research has evolved over time [33]. The task and work related usability paradigm that focus on the achievement of behavioural goals in work settings [34] has been expanded beyond the instrumental to the holistic, aesthetic and hedonic user experience (UX) paradigm [35].…”
Section: Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refined methodologies and reliable measures are required to assess aspects such as, for example, knowledge discovery and decision making quality. A framework should be constructed in order to adopt evaluation practices from fields like computer supported cooperative work and ubiquitous services [33,51,60]. New systems for collaborative use of visualisation are emerging.…”
Section: Challenges In Design Of Collaborative Visualisation Environmmentioning
confidence: 99%