Evaluating the elevation of authoritative health content online during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

PurposeTo respond to the COVID-19 “infodemic” and combat fraud and misinformation about the virus, social media platforms coordinated with government healthcare agencies around the world to elevate authoritative content about the novel coronavirus. These public health authorities included national and global public health organisations, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO). In this article, the authors evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy by asking two key questions: (1) Did people engage with authoritative health content on social media? (2) Was this content trusted?Design/methodology/approachThe authors explore these issues by drawing on data from a global online questionnaire on “Public Trust in Experts” (n = 429) conducted during the initial phase of the pandemic in May 2020, a crucial period when reliable information was urgently required to influence behaviour and minimise harm.FindingsThe authors found that while the majority of those surveyed noticed authoritative health content online, there remained significant issues in terms of Internet users trusting the information shared by government healthcare agencies and public health authorities online.Originality/valueIn what follows, the authors examine the role of trust in implementing this novel public health strategy and assess the capacity for such policies to reduce individual and social harm.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-12-2021-0655

Transgender health information: assessing the quality of online resources

“…However, the results of this study indicate that information resources at the government level do not meet the expected standard of providing quality transgender health information. This result accepting the findings of Walsh et al (2023) and they revealed that although most survey respondents recognized credible health information on the internet, there were substantial concerns regarding the trustworthiness of information from government healthcare agencies and public health authorities online.…”

The infinity vaccine war: linguistic regularities and audience engagement of vaccine debate on Twitter

“…The data showed that 3 in 4 British and 2 in 3 Americans were willing to receive coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, a quarter of people in the United States, Germany and France were hesitant about or squarely against getting the COVID-19 vaccine (Kantar, 2021). This poll, along with previous studies, demonstrated the extraordinary predicament that the global health-care system is facing, and the knife-edge that public health experts have been walking (Walsh et al, 2022). Vaccine hesitancy is a threat to the global recovery from the historical pandemic and also to the well-being of the entire population.…”

Social Media Fact-Checking: The Effects of News Literacy and News Trust on the Intent to Verify Health-Related Information

“…At the corporate level, the advertising sector and online platforms came to an agreement on a "Code of Practice on Disinformation" [35] to combat false information. Thus, major tech companies introduced warnings about false information, automated fact-checking, and tools for users to tag false news manually [36][37][38]. And social media industry leaders, some now united under Meta Platforms, Inc., expressed their agreement to fight misinformation with the release of a joint statement on combating fake news in 2020 [39].…”