2020
DOI: 10.5751/ace-01671-150210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the efficacy of eBird data for modeling historical population trajectories of North American birds and for monitoring populations of boreal and Arctic breeding species

Abstract: Historic population trajectories for most North American bird species are largely unknown for years prior to circa 1970. Additionally, current estimates of population trajectories of boreal and Arctic breeding species are imprecise or biased because of lack of coverage by Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) routes in that region. Citizen science data, in particular eBird data, could fill these information gaps. Bayesian regression models of eBird data were used to estimate population trajectories of 22 boreal or Arctic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, I give a conceptual example of fitting an ADSR model to empirical ecological data (Figure 3b); in this case the impact of spruce budworms on Canadian forests (Walker & Taylor, 2020). Using the ADSR model, I describe this disturbance as having an attack and decay stage of 8 years each, with a release stage of 20 years-a dynamic that is a poor fit to any previously described disturbance dynamic.…”
Section: How To Solve the Question Through The New Ideamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, I give a conceptual example of fitting an ADSR model to empirical ecological data (Figure 3b); in this case the impact of spruce budworms on Canadian forests (Walker & Taylor, 2020). Using the ADSR model, I describe this disturbance as having an attack and decay stage of 8 years each, with a release stage of 20 years-a dynamic that is a poor fit to any previously described disturbance dynamic.…”
Section: How To Solve the Question Through The New Ideamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disturbance amplitude values are adjusted to ensure that the area under the curve is approximately equal (models without this adjustment also showed effects of varying attack and release parameters). An example (b) of an Attack, Decay, Sustain, and Release (ADSR) model fit to empirical ecological data, in this case the intensity of a spruce budworm outbreak in North America (re-plotted with permission fromWalker & Taylor, 2020). The gray polygon outlines the model with its parameters given at left, and the points represent the sum of hectares showing moderate or greater defoliation for that year this model, as implemented byJohnsson (2021), showed apparent non-linear behavior in response to varying values of release (see Supporting Information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, I give a conceptual example of fitting an ADSR model to empirical ecological data (Figure 3b), in this case the impact of spruce budworms on Canadian forests (Walker & Taylor, 2020). Using the ADSR model, I describe this disturbance as having an attack and decay stage of eight years each, with a release stage of twenty years -a dynamic that is a poor fit to any previously described disturbance dynamic.…”
Section: How To Solve the Question Through The New Ideamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BBS data can be used to estimate relative abundance while accounting for observation error because these data follow a standardized protocol 12 . BBS data are commonly used to study population trends and species distributions 13 , 14 , yet observer availability and restriction to roads may lead to spatially unequal sampling and limited representation of some habitat types and species 15 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%