2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-76951-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimisation of the Peer-Led Flipped Model Using TEL Resources Within Neuroanatomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Study 1, the flipped and lecture sections received the same amount of review questions, and had similar exam averages. This finding is consistent with randomized flipped class studies that control for differences in repeated review [24][25][26][32][33][34]. Specifically, in two courses within an ophthalmology clerkship training program, no statistically-significant differences in exam scores were found between students randomized into: 1) a lecture section that provided review questions as homework or 2) a flipped section that used the review questions for in class discussion and presentations [24].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In Study 1, the flipped and lecture sections received the same amount of review questions, and had similar exam averages. This finding is consistent with randomized flipped class studies that control for differences in repeated review [24][25][26][32][33][34]. Specifically, in two courses within an ophthalmology clerkship training program, no statistically-significant differences in exam scores were found between students randomized into: 1) a lecture section that provided review questions as homework or 2) a flipped section that used the review questions for in class discussion and presentations [24].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 71%