2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2023.101204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of design methods: A systematic review and assessment framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would allow its repetition everywhere and at any time. A recent review found that design research lacks standard evidence in the area of design research [41], highlighting the necessity of models that could be implemented or improved through a scientific process. Considering the above aspects, the present study proposed a first example of a city park model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would allow its repetition everywhere and at any time. A recent review found that design research lacks standard evidence in the area of design research [41], highlighting the necessity of models that could be implemented or improved through a scientific process. Considering the above aspects, the present study proposed a first example of a city park model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, a practice-centric dimension is added to the theory development on method properties [56] and the proposals made therein. The proposed requirements and characteristics may further provide added depth to method evaluations carried out according to Cash et al's [57] framework.…”
Section: Discussion-enhancing Design Methods Development Selection Im...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daalhuizen and Cash [56] proposed Method Content Theory. Departing from this, Cash et al [57] pointed out the lack of a consolidated procedure for assessing design methods and, in response, proposed a systematic assessment framework to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of design methods. While these contributions add to our knowledge with measurable characteristics of design methods and on evaluation of design methods, these are generalizations based on theoretically prescribed properties of "good theories" and "good artifacts".…”
Section: General Criticism and Identified Causes Of Low Methods Use A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A "good" method integrates goals, procedures, rationale, framing, and mindset for internal clarity and external applicability, combining theoretical robustness with practical use (Cash et al, 2023;Daalhuizen and Cash, 2021). It ensures actionable steps, relevance, and adaptability while aligning the user's cognitive framework with the method's core for smooth application (Andreasen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Framework Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, careful methodological considerations are necessary to mitigate these limitations. Further research is needed to validate the method's effectiveness and efficacy using other methods suggested in the literature (Cash et al, 2023;Daalhuizen and Cash, 2021;Jan Fredrik Schønheyder et al, 2018;Matthias Eisenmann et al, 2021). Additionally, testing the framework with larger sample sizes in both design and engineering teams would enable a more in-depth exploration of its applicability across a broader range of method users.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%