Evaluating the Effects of the Informal Sector on the Growth of Formal Sector Enterprises: Lessons From Italy

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effect of unregistered and informal sector business ventures on the growth of formal sector enterprises. The hypotheses tested is that formal sector enterprises that have to compete against unregistered or informal sector business ventures suffer from lower levels of performance, measured by annual sales growth, annual employment growth and annual productivity growth. To evaluate this thesis, data is reported from a World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES) of 760 enterprises in Italy collected in 2019. The finding is that formal sector enterprises that report competing against unregistered or informal sector business ventures have significantly lower annual sales growth and annual productivity growth than enterprises that do not. The paper concludes by discussing the theoretical and policy implications, along with the limitations of the study and future research required.

Assessing the impacts of the individual micro-entrepreneur act in Brazil: 10 years later

“…For instance, Welter et al (2015) claims that a prosperous economy, such as the UK, strongly depends on informal activities in order to promote job opportunities and income generation, especially when it comes to their immigrant communities. As stated by Kosta and Williams (2020), Italy is another example of a developed country, in which formal and informal enterprises collaborate intensively. As such, in developed countries, despite the existence of rigid labor market regulations, there are many economic activities, such as cleaning, that are dominated by informal activity (Blanchflower et.…”

Informal Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda

“…The reactive formalizing pathway is perceived as a strategic policymaking tool capable of producing positive externalities related to compliance (Webb et al, 2013; Williams, 2015). More specifically, this pathway may lead to neutralize the loss of tax revenues and thus increase the liquidity of governments, which is instrumental in developing infrastructure and providing social services (Galiani et al, 2017); to reduce the amount of informal labor engaged in by employees without proper employment contracts, social provision, or insurance cover (Maloney, 2004); to reduce the number of informal entrepreneurs flouting environmental regulations, using harmful fuels, or adopting environmentally dangerous trash disposal practices (Imamoglu, 2018); and finally, to reduce the level of unfair competition between formal and informal enterprises (Kosta & Williams, 2020).…”

Entry, speed and degree of formality for household businesses: an integrated approach

“…Formality may provide benefits, including access to credit markets, property rights, formal education (for which informal institutions cannot adequately substitute), membership in business associations, contracts with large firms and the ability to become more capital-intensive (Fajnzylber et al, 2011;Skousen and Mahoney, 2015). The outperformance of enterprises delaying formality may be due not only to their ability to devote resources to overcoming some of their other internal and external liabilities associated with newness but also to the fact that the benefits of formality are insufficient to enable those registered from the start to outperform those delaying registration (Kosta and Williams, 2020). Household businesses that began unregistered and remained informal for an extended period have significantly higher annual sales, employment and productivity growth rates than businesses registered from the beginning (Williams et al, 2017):…”