2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effects of sedentary behaviour on plantar skin health in people with diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, there were no clear differences in cytokine response between individuals with commodities, for example, diabetic and non‐diabetic patients. This is in contrast to a previous study wherein individuals with diabetes showed more expression of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines, albeit in the sole of the foot known to be at risk of tissue damage in this population 45 . There were also no clear differences between the different locations, that is, sacrum and buttocks, of the skin damage as well as BMI and gender.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, there were no clear differences in cytokine response between individuals with commodities, for example, diabetic and non‐diabetic patients. This is in contrast to a previous study wherein individuals with diabetes showed more expression of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines, albeit in the sole of the foot known to be at risk of tissue damage in this population 45 . There were also no clear differences between the different locations, that is, sacrum and buttocks, of the skin damage as well as BMI and gender.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to a previous study wherein individuals with diabetes showed more expression of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines, albeit in the sole of the foot known to be at risk of tissue damage in this population. 45 There were also no clear differences between the different locations, that is, sacrum and buttocks, of the skin damage as well as BMI and gender. Owing to the pragmatic approach of the study, there were differences in the number of days between the first sebum sampling and the day redness was first reported by the clinicians, this ranged from 0 to 50 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Similar to the process of normalization used for epithelial (moisture) barrier outcomes, inflammatory biomarker values were normalized to a baseline value (time point zero) to accommodate individual variability in sebum values, as previously described. 15,18 A closer analysis of the data revealed their distribution was non-normal in nature, and nonparametric inferential statistical tests were therefore selected to analyze study outcomes. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze differences in responses at the different time points of data collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from each outcome variable were imported into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft 365; Redmond, Washington) and normalized to baseline values (ie, postapplication value/baseline value). Similar to the process of normalization used for epithelial (moisture) barrier outcomes, inflammatory biomarker values were normalized to a baseline value (time point zero) to accommodate individual variability in sebum values, as previously described 15,18. A closer analysis of the data revealed their distribution was non-normal in nature, and nonparametric inferential statistical tests were therefore selected to analyze study outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values from TEWL, SC hydration, erythema and inflammatory biomarker concentrations were normalised to the baseline for each test session (post/pre-respirator application ratio) in order to enable comparisons of relative variations across the experimental time frame and between the participants. 8,22 Shapiro Wilk test and D'Agostino-Pearson were used to assess the distribution of the data. Accordingly, a parametric two-way analysis of variance with replication was employed to evaluate the effect of repeated respirator application derived from each test session and the difference between measurement sites for each parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%