Abstract:Background:Although cervical cancer is highly preventable through regular screenings using Pap smear or human papillomavirus–deoxyribonucleic acid tests, cervical cancer remains a prevalent women's health issue across the world. Therefore, encouraging women to screen for cervical cancer is very important for the early detection of cervical cancer.Purpose:The purposes of this study were to (1) assess the effectiveness of three interventions that are typically used to increase the uptake of cervical cancer scree… Show more
“…Training Centres (KETEMs) provide screening service free of charge, these rates are expected to be substantively higher. However, the low rate of having a Pap smear test found in this study is in parallel with the results of previous national reports (6,14). However, in several previous reports, it has been stated because of having no health insurance or a low socio-economic status, women could not join the screening programs (22) and medical costs have been reported to be barrier to not having the Pap smear test (23).…”
Section: Considering That Cancer Early Diagnosis Screening Andsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In another study, 79% of the women in an age range of 40-64 years were found to have had a Pap smear test one in the previous 3 years (21). In Turkey, in three different studies conducted in different groups from different regions, these ratios were reported to be 13.5%, 25.2%, and 66.1%, respectively (6,7,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Watts et al (25) reported that the women with at least a high school educational status (56%) had a higher rate of having a Pap smear test. Several other investigations have shown that low levels of education are reliable indicators for screening non-adherence (14,26). It is considered that the women did not allocate time for the Pap smear test because they were young and they had work-or family-related responsibilities.…”
Section: Considering That Cancer Early Diagnosis Screening Andmentioning
Objective: This study aimed to identify the barriers to women's Pap smear testing and related risk factors. Methods: In this descriptive and cross-sectional study, 294 women were included by stratified random sampling. The General Information Questionnaire, The Self-Efficacy Scale, The Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer, and the Pap Smear Test were used. Results: About half of the women (47.6%) had a Pap smear test in their lifetime. Residing in a village/non-provincial district (OR = 0.412), not having a Pap smear test because family members/friends did not have one (OR = 7.752), having high Barriers subscale scores (OR = 1.053), and having lower self-efficacy levels (OR = 0.951) were found to be risk factors for not having a Pap smear test. In addition, not knowing the symptoms of cervical cancer, believing that the cervical cancer is a non-treatable condition, expecting to experience vaginal infection, not being able to get permission from her husband, and considering the test as embarrassing were found among the barriers (p < 0.005). Conclusion: A well designed health education program focusing on cervical cancer and the benefits of screening would increase awareness, especially among women with a high educational attainment status. Public health nurses and midwives should provide health educations considering the local cultural environment. To improve access to health services, mobile health services need to be developed, and in hospitals, routine Pap smear test health educations should be conducted and guidance should be provided.
“…Training Centres (KETEMs) provide screening service free of charge, these rates are expected to be substantively higher. However, the low rate of having a Pap smear test found in this study is in parallel with the results of previous national reports (6,14). However, in several previous reports, it has been stated because of having no health insurance or a low socio-economic status, women could not join the screening programs (22) and medical costs have been reported to be barrier to not having the Pap smear test (23).…”
Section: Considering That Cancer Early Diagnosis Screening Andsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In another study, 79% of the women in an age range of 40-64 years were found to have had a Pap smear test one in the previous 3 years (21). In Turkey, in three different studies conducted in different groups from different regions, these ratios were reported to be 13.5%, 25.2%, and 66.1%, respectively (6,7,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Watts et al (25) reported that the women with at least a high school educational status (56%) had a higher rate of having a Pap smear test. Several other investigations have shown that low levels of education are reliable indicators for screening non-adherence (14,26). It is considered that the women did not allocate time for the Pap smear test because they were young and they had work-or family-related responsibilities.…”
Section: Considering That Cancer Early Diagnosis Screening Andmentioning
Objective: This study aimed to identify the barriers to women's Pap smear testing and related risk factors. Methods: In this descriptive and cross-sectional study, 294 women were included by stratified random sampling. The General Information Questionnaire, The Self-Efficacy Scale, The Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer, and the Pap Smear Test were used. Results: About half of the women (47.6%) had a Pap smear test in their lifetime. Residing in a village/non-provincial district (OR = 0.412), not having a Pap smear test because family members/friends did not have one (OR = 7.752), having high Barriers subscale scores (OR = 1.053), and having lower self-efficacy levels (OR = 0.951) were found to be risk factors for not having a Pap smear test. In addition, not knowing the symptoms of cervical cancer, believing that the cervical cancer is a non-treatable condition, expecting to experience vaginal infection, not being able to get permission from her husband, and considering the test as embarrassing were found among the barriers (p < 0.005). Conclusion: A well designed health education program focusing on cervical cancer and the benefits of screening would increase awareness, especially among women with a high educational attainment status. Public health nurses and midwives should provide health educations considering the local cultural environment. To improve access to health services, mobile health services need to be developed, and in hospitals, routine Pap smear test health educations should be conducted and guidance should be provided.
“…Bu sonuçlar kadınların sık görülen kanserler ve erken tanısıyla ilgili bilgilendirilmesinin farkındalıklarını arttırarak, erken tanı yöntemlerine başvurma oranlarını arttıracağını göstermektedir (25). Günümüzde serviks kanseri nedeni ile olan ölümlerin %90'ı tarama çalışmalarının sistematik ve yaygın şekilde yapılmadığı gelişmekte olan ülkelerde görülmektedir (11) kadınlara serviks kanseri ve pap smear testi ile ilgili eğitim/broşür verilmesiyle ve evde izlemiyle serviks kanseri bilgi düzeylerinde ve taramalara katılımlarında anlamlı artışlar görülmüştür (26,27). Sağlık çalışanlarının pap smear testi ile ilgili farkındalık yaratma ve pap smear taramalarına katılım oranlarını arttırmada önemli sorumlulukları bulunmaktadır.…”
Section: Rahim Ağzı Kanseri Ve Pap Smear Testi Sağlık İnanç Modeli öLçeğiunclassified
Aim: This study was carried out to determine the status of having a Pap smear test among women admitted to a family health center and their health beliefs about cervical cancer and Pap smear test.
Material and Methods:This cross-sectional study was carried out with 259 women admitted to a Family Health Center on the Anatolian side of Istanbul. The data were collected using the Information Form on Socio-demographic Characteristics Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear Test and the Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear Test. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test were used in the evaluation of data.Results: It was determined that 76.2% of the women had heard about a Pap smear test, and 54.1% of them had undergone the Pap smear test. It was determined that the women who were over the age of 40 and had previously heard of the Pap smear test and cervical cancer had undergone the Pap smear test at a higher rate. It was determined that the mean score for the sensitivity sub-dimension of the women over the age of forty and the mean score for the health motivation sub-dimension of the women who received education above 8 years and were employed were high, and their Pap smear barriers were low (p<0.05). It was determined that the mean score for the usefulness and motivation sub-dimensions of those who had heard about the Pap smear test was high, and the mean score for the Pap smear barriers sub-dimension was low. It was determined that the mean scores for the usefulness and motivation and health motivation sub-dimensions of those who had previously had about the Pap smear test were high, and their Pap smear barriers were low (p<0.05).
Conclusion:It was determined that the women who were over the age of 40 and had previously heard of the Pap smear test and cervical cancer had undergone the Pap smear test at a higher rate. It was determined that women's age, level of education, employment status, and the status of hearing and having undergone the Pap smear test positively affected their beliefs about cervical cancer and Pap smear test.
“…As access to DDAs increases, patients' knowledge about hepatitis C could influence uptake of hepatitis screening, linkage to treatment, and treatment outcomes, thereby impacting the likelihood of successful elimination campaigns. Participant's disease-related knowledge has been associated with increased participation in screening campaigns for many diseases, including cervical cancer [7], hepatitis B [8], and HIV [9]. Among patients enrolled in hepatitis C treatment programs, higher patient knowledge has been associated with reduced loss to follow-up [10], while other educational interventions, such as singlesession group educational interventions and multisession one-on-one educational interventions, have been associated with increased willingness to initiate treatment, reduced time to treatment initiation, increased adherence, and increased likelihood of sustained virologic response (SVR) [11][12][13].…”
Background
Curative direct-acting antiviral treatment (DAA) has made it plausible to implement hepatitis C elimination interventions. However, poor hepatitis C knowledge among patients could impede the effectiveness of screening and treatment programs.
Objective
We assessed knowledge on hepatitis C among rural Rwandans initiating DAA treatment for hepatitis C in a prospective cohort.
Methods
We administered 15 true-false statements before treatment initiation and during one follow-up visit occurring either 1 or 2 months after treatment initiation. We assessed the average number of correct responses per patient, the proportion of correct responses to individual statements, pre-treatment predictors of knowledge, and whether post-initiation knowledge was associated with time since treatment initiation, quality of care, or adherence.
Results
Among 333 patients who answered knowledge questions before treatment initiation, 325 (97.6%) were re-assessed at a post-initiation visit. Pre-initiation, 72.1% knew hepatitis C was curable, 61.9% knew that hepatitis C could cause liver damage or cancer, and 42.3% knew that people with hepatitis C could look and feel fine. The average number of correct responses was 8.1 out of 15 (95% CI: 7.8–8.5), but was significantly lower among those with low educational attainment or with low literacy. Post-initiation, correct responses increased by an average of 2.0 statements (95% CI: 1.6, 2.4,
p
-value <0.001). Many patients still mistakenly believed that hepatitis C could be transmitted through kissing (66.5%), eating utensils (44.1%), handshakes (34.8%), and hugs (34.8%). Post-initiation knowledge is inversely associated with self-reported quality of care and unassociated with self-reported adherence.
Conclusion
Although knowledge improved over time, key gaps persisted among patients. Accessible public education campaigns targeted to low-literacy populations emphasizing that hepatitis C can be asymptomatic, has severe consequences, and is curable could promote participation in mass screening campaigns and linkage to care. Visual tools could facilitate clinician-provided patient education.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.