2016
DOI: 10.4103/1687-1693.180465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effect of midodrine on renal resistance index in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most patients in GI were child A, on the other hand, the majority of patients in GII were Child C. There was a statistical high significant positive correlation between renal resistive index and child classification. This result was in agreement with the study done by Yan and Zhang [33] and Moustafa et al [34] who detected that, there was positive correlation between RI and Child-Pugh classification. Moreover, Child C patients had the highest RI followed by Child B patients and lastly Child A patients.…”
Section: Between Giii and Gi P2:between Giii And Giia P3:between supporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most patients in GI were child A, on the other hand, the majority of patients in GII were Child C. There was a statistical high significant positive correlation between renal resistive index and child classification. This result was in agreement with the study done by Yan and Zhang [33] and Moustafa et al [34] who detected that, there was positive correlation between RI and Child-Pugh classification. Moreover, Child C patients had the highest RI followed by Child B patients and lastly Child A patients.…”
Section: Between Giii and Gi P2:between Giii And Giia P3:between supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Patients with high MELD score had higher RI. These results also were in agreement with those of Umbro et al [37] and Moustafa et al [34] In this study, Resistive index ROC curve analysis showed that, RI had AUROC = 0.997 and if the Cutoff point of renal RI was 0.71, the sensitivity of the test was 100%, the specificity was 80%, PPV was 44%, NPV was 100% and accuracy was 82%. The results of this study were close to that reported by Abdel-Bary et al [35] who stated that, RI ROC curve analysis showed that RI had AUROC = 0.903 (95% CI: 0.835-0.949 and P<0.001).…”
Section: Between Giii and Gi P2:between Giii And Giia P3:between supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation