2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the double Poisson generalized linear model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More nonmixture models presenting dual properties of over-and underdispersion are: the compound generalized Poisson distribution, 32 the Katz System yielding the generalized event count model, 33,34 or the Conway-Maxwell Poisson model. 35,36 A further reason for observing underdispersion is data truncation. Right truncation is observed when events above a fixed value (c r ) are not counted, whereas left truncation occurs when the censoring affects counts below a set value (c l ).…”
Section: Count Model Components For Data Violating Poisson Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More nonmixture models presenting dual properties of over-and underdispersion are: the compound generalized Poisson distribution, 32 the Katz System yielding the generalized event count model, 33,34 or the Conway-Maxwell Poisson model. 35,36 A further reason for observing underdispersion is data truncation. Right truncation is observed when events above a fixed value (c r ) are not counted, whereas left truncation occurs when the censoring affects counts below a set value (c l ).…”
Section: Count Model Components For Data Violating Poisson Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first parameterization, proposed by Winkelmann and applied to crash data first by Oh et al ., assumes that the time elapsed between each two successive crashes (waiting time) follows a gamma distribution. This approach implies that crash events are “dependent in the sense that the occurrence of at least one event (in contrast to none) up to time t influences the probability of a further occurrence in t +∆ t .” Nonetheless, while crash counts can sometimes have a temporal correlation, they are often described as independent observations . Recently, Daniels et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used a different parameterization of the gamma model in which they assumed that the crash frequency itself follows a continuous gamma density function. Two major theoretical shortcomings exist for this assumption: it implies that crash counts of zero are not possible, and that noninteger crash counts may be observed . Both implications are obviously fallacious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other extensions based on Poisson models include the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson model (Lord, Geedipally, & Guikema, 2010;Lord, Guikema, & Geedipally, 2008), the double Poisson model (Zou, Geedipally, & Lord, 2013), the hyper-Poisson model (Khazraee, Sáez-Castillo, Geedipally, & Lord, 2014), the Poisson-lognormal model (Park & Lord, 2007), the Poisson-Weibull model (Cheng, Geedipally, & Lord, 2013), among others. The Conway-Maxwell-Poisson model, double Poisson model, and hyper-Poisson model can handle both over-and under-dispersion, although under-dispersion is rarely seen in crash data.…”
Section: Crash-frequency Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%