2016
DOI: 10.1177/1948550616644657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Domain Specificity of Mental Health–Related Mind-Sets

Abstract: Mind-sets are beliefs regarding the malleability of self-attributes. Research suggests they are domain-specific, meaning that individuals can hold a fixed (immutability) mind-set about one attribute and a growth (malleability) mind-set about another. Although mind-set specificity has been investigated for broad attributes such as personality and intelligence, less is known about mental health mind-sets (e.g., beliefs about anxiety) that have greater relevance to clinical science. In two studies, we took a late… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
70
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(80 reference statements)
9
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Confirming the domain specificity of implicit theories of intelligence (Schroder et al., ), we did not find evidence for the Intensity of Previous Day's Social Stressors (lagged t − 1) × Implicit Theories of Intelligence interaction on the next day's cortisol levels (see Table , Model V).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Confirming the domain specificity of implicit theories of intelligence (Schroder et al., ), we did not find evidence for the Intensity of Previous Day's Social Stressors (lagged t − 1) × Implicit Theories of Intelligence interaction on the next day's cortisol levels (see Table , Model V).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…When we feel others’ traits are fixed, it can lead to the same conclusion. Although in general, the closer an implicit theory is to the domain of the outcome, the more predictive it will be , we have not yet found different associations for self theories of personality versus other theories. To reflect the state of the evidence so far, I discuss them jointly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It should be noted that recent studies (e.g., Schroder, Dawood, Yalch, Donnellan, & Moser, ) have found evidence for domain specificity of implicit theories; a strong entity or incremental theory of one domain may or may not indicate a tendency to have globally rigid or flexible cognitive styles in other domains. As pointed out by Gelman (), individuals often maintain different theories regarding their intelligence, socioemotional self, physical skills, and physical attractiveness, and thus beliefs about stability and malleability of traits or behaviors may vary depending on the particular domain.…”
Section: Implicit Entity and Incremental Theories Of Personalitymentioning
confidence: 97%