2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8040325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Diurnal Cycle of Upper Tropospheric Humidity in Two Different Climate Models Using Satellite Observations

Abstract: Abstract:The diurnal cycle of upper tropospheric humidity (UTH) is known to be influenced by such processes as convection and the formation of clouds which are parameterized in current global climate models. In this study, we evaluate the performance of two climate models, the Community Atmospheric Model version 5 (CAM-5) and the Global Atmosphere 3.0 (GA-3) model in simulating the diurnal cycle of UTH (represented by a combination of sinusoids of 12 and 24 h periods) by comparing with microwave and infrared (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5c, 6c). The peak time of RH "release" from the cloud oscillates between late afternoon and early morning maxima (Kottayil et al, 2016) and its lag with respect to cirrus can be estimated as ∼ 3.5 h. Finally, thin cirrus show good coupling with high opaque clouds and the cirrus, and the amplitudes of their diurnal cycle are comparable with those of the cirrus. The peak times for these clouds have broad distributions that make it difficult to estimate the lags.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 88%
“…5c, 6c). The peak time of RH "release" from the cloud oscillates between late afternoon and early morning maxima (Kottayil et al, 2016) and its lag with respect to cirrus can be estimated as ∼ 3.5 h. Finally, thin cirrus show good coupling with high opaque clouds and the cirrus, and the amplitudes of their diurnal cycle are comparable with those of the cirrus. The peak times for these clouds have broad distributions that make it difficult to estimate the lags.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, while the diurnal variations of the total precipitable water and cloud amounts across the tropics have been established (e.g. 1113 ), most of the satellite-based studies 1419 and most model studies 4,10,2024 do not include the detailed vertical dimension necessary to robustly distinguish the diurnal cycles of humidity 2528 and clouds in the lower troposphere and the free troposphere. Furthermore, satellite-based climatologies are usually less robust over land than ocean, which limits the possibility to contrast the diurnal cycle of clouds and water vapor over the different surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third key assumption is that the diurnal cycle is small compared to the natural variability (which is fulfilled given the small amplitude of the diurnal cycle for sounding channels reported in other studies; Kottayil et al, , ; Chung et al, ; Chung, Soden, Sohn, et al, ) and that in consequence the distribution of the variability inside the 0.8 K SEVIRI matchup thresholds is unbiased. We tested this by examining the SEVIRI brightness temperature difference between the two microwave matchup pair members (not shown), and it is indeed uniform between −0.8 and +0.8 K, with the exception of a modest spike at zero due to SEVIRI numeric truncation noise, which has no impact on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%