2022
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-3474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the diagnostic value of using metagenomic next-generation sequencing on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and tissue in infectious pathogens located in the peripheral lung field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of mNGS in detecting lung disease pathogens include its unbiased comprehensive profiling of microbial genomes, high throughput sequence, rapid results, and high sensitivity, even in patients previously treated with antibiotics. Additionally, BALF meets the requirements for accurate diagnosis of lung infections ( 12 ) and is feasible and accurate for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. However, there are limitations to using mNGS, including (I) limited access to NGS platform due to technical requirement and high cost; (II) the challenge of obtaining qualified samples; (III) the potential detection of both pathogens and the airway microbiome; (IV) the need for a specific method for fungi DNA extraction when fungal infection is suspected based on clinical evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of mNGS in detecting lung disease pathogens include its unbiased comprehensive profiling of microbial genomes, high throughput sequence, rapid results, and high sensitivity, even in patients previously treated with antibiotics. Additionally, BALF meets the requirements for accurate diagnosis of lung infections ( 12 ) and is feasible and accurate for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. However, there are limitations to using mNGS, including (I) limited access to NGS platform due to technical requirement and high cost; (II) the challenge of obtaining qualified samples; (III) the potential detection of both pathogens and the airway microbiome; (IV) the need for a specific method for fungi DNA extraction when fungal infection is suspected based on clinical evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mNGS of BALF (5) has the potential to improve pathogen identification in severe pneumonia, and it is widely used in identifying pathogens, especially in severe cases. The advantages of mNGS in the detection of lung disease pathogens include that it can provide unbiased comprehensive profiling of microbial genomes with high throughput sequence, great speed, and high sensitivity, even in patients pretreated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, as well as allowing to identify the anaerobic bacteria and viruses that are not searched for in the routine tests; moreover, it is feasible and accurate in BALF of patients under mechanical ventilation, as BALF meets the requirements for accurate diagnosis of lung infections (13). Besides BALF, lung biopsy tissues and tracheal aspirates are proved to be effective to identify pulmonary infectious pathogens (12), and the standardized quality control and data interpretation are also important to improve the accuracy of mNGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the turnaround time of bacterial/fungal cultures is long (3–7 days) in conventional microbiological testing. 4 The low positive rates cannot meet the need for early pathogen diagnosis. 5 mNGS, known as a powerful, low-cost, shorter turn round-time method, has been used in pathogen diagnosis in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%