2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06151-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Costs and Outcomes of Hospital Nursing Resources: a Matched Cohort Study of Patients with Common Medical Conditions

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Nursing resources, such as staffing ratios and skill mix, vary across hospitals. Better nursing resources have been linked to better patient outcomes but are assumed to increase costs. The value of investments in nursing resources, in terms of clinical benefits relative to costs, is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are differential clinical outcomes, costs, and value among medical patients at hospitals characterized by better or worse nursing resources. DESIGN: Matched cohort study of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We report LOS results only for surgical patients because previous work revealed that LOS for medical patients was not associated with either staffing or the work environment. 22 Additional outcomes were derived from the patient survey and dichotomised to facilitate their presentation and interpretation: patient ratings of their hospitals on a 10-point scale (contrasting patients rating their hospital lower than 7 with patients rating it 7 or higher) and whether patients would (or would not) definitely recommend their hospital.…”
Section: Patient and Nurse Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report LOS results only for surgical patients because previous work revealed that LOS for medical patients was not associated with either staffing or the work environment. 22 Additional outcomes were derived from the patient survey and dichotomised to facilitate their presentation and interpretation: patient ratings of their hospitals on a 10-point scale (contrasting patients rating their hospital lower than 7 with patients rating it 7 or higher) and whether patients would (or would not) definitely recommend their hospital.…”
Section: Patient and Nurse Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of adult medical patients showed that patients in hospitals with better nurse resources had better outcomes including less mortality, fewer readmissions and shorter lengths of stay—at no difference in cost, when compared with similar patients in hospitals with poorer resources. 23 These study findings have been corroborated in surgical patients; 24 25 and find that improving nurse staffing would avoid adverse outcomes with sizeable cost savings to hospitals. 26 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Improving the nurse work environment is a solution that can be employed in these hospitals in order to combat chronic and acute threats to hospital care delivery. We know that there continues to be significant variation in quality of care and nurse outcomes across hospitals (Lasater et al, 2020). An important next step would be to evaluate the relationships we examined herein in more current data to determine whether the findings are stable or whether there have been changes relative to the baseline we establish in this study, perhaps induced by the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%