2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the concentrations of total mercury, methylmercury, selenium, and selenium:mercury molar ratios in traditional foods of the Bigstone Cree in Alberta, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown by research from Canada, in small grazers, like the hare, MeHg constituted about 3% of THg in muscles and 13% in livers. In the muscles of herbivore moose, the percentage of MeHg was slightly higher amounting to 13% (Golzadeh et al 2020 ). In the case of roe deer from Slovenia, the percentage of MeHg was about 10% in muscles and 40% in livers (Gnamuš et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown by research from Canada, in small grazers, like the hare, MeHg constituted about 3% of THg in muscles and 13% in livers. In the muscles of herbivore moose, the percentage of MeHg was slightly higher amounting to 13% (Golzadeh et al 2020 ). In the case of roe deer from Slovenia, the percentage of MeHg was about 10% in muscles and 40% in livers (Gnamuš et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of roe deer from Slovenia, the percentage of MeHg was about 10% in muscles and 40% in livers (Gnamuš et al, 2020). Studies conducted in Northern America indicated that tissues of animals placed higher in the food chain, such as omnivorous ground squirrel and bear had a similar share of MeHg in THg to herbivores (Lasorsa and Allen-Gil 1995 ; Golzadeh et al 2020 ). In the case of fish-eating mammals, such as mink and otter, the increase in the MeHg contribution to THg in their tissues and organs was significant and reached about 90% in the muscles and 60–80% in the livers (Evans et al 2000 ; Strom 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average mercury concentration in moose tissues (liver: 0.007+0.001, muscle: 0.004+0.001, kidney: 0.079+0.02 mg / kg wet weight) is 1.5-2.5 times higher than in the corresponding tissues of moose (Alces americanus) in Mackenzie Valley (Dehcho region, Northwest Canada) (liver: 0.005, muscle: 0.002, kidney: 0.03 mg/kg wet weight) [8]. At the same time, the average concentration of mercury in muscles of moose traditionally eaten by the local population (0.004+0.001 mg/kg wet weight) is comparable to the level of total mercury in traditional foods of the Bigstone Cree tribe in Alberta, Canada (0.003 ± 0.001 raw weight) [9]. The average mercury concentration in wild boar tissues of the Russky Sever National Park (liver: 0.419+0.205, kidneys: 0.711+0.253 mg/kg wet weight) is higher than the mercury concentrations determined by dry weight in the corresponding wild boar in nature reserves and national parks of Poland: unpolluted area within the Mazurski Landscape Reserve (liver: 0.043, kidneys: 0.321 mg/kg dry weight), agricultural land within Snieznicki Landscape Park (liver: 0.043, kidney: 0.314 mg/kg dry weight), non-industrial area near Bieszczadzki National Park (liver: 0.101, kidney: 0.729 mg/kg dry weight) [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute exposure to HMs can severely damage lungs, liver, kidneys, and the central nervous system (ATSDR, 2004). Long-term exposure can lead to HM bioaccumulation not only in humans, but also in crops, soil, and wildlife used as food sources, indirectly affecting humans [ 218 , 219 ]. While acute exposures to HMs knowingly causes severe toxic effects, concerns by public health authorities are currently focused on chronic, low-dose exposures, which can lead to cumulative effects.…”
Section: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Of Toxicity On Hematopomentioning
confidence: 99%