2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the comparability of two measures of lexical diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result challenges the Limited Attentional Capacity Hypothesis, as well as the Cognition Hypothesis, which held that lexical complexity would be reduced when the task complexity was increased. In fact, the simplest way to measure the number of different words in a text is to calculate its type-token ratio, but the type-token ratio is easily influenced by the length of the text [45]. In view of this, the present study added three measures, namely, NDW-50, NDWER-50, and NDWES-50.…”
Section: The Main Effects Of Prior Knowledge On Linguistic Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result challenges the Limited Attentional Capacity Hypothesis, as well as the Cognition Hypothesis, which held that lexical complexity would be reduced when the task complexity was increased. In fact, the simplest way to measure the number of different words in a text is to calculate its type-token ratio, but the type-token ratio is easily influenced by the length of the text [45]. In view of this, the present study added three measures, namely, NDW-50, NDWER-50, and NDWES-50.…”
Section: The Main Effects Of Prior Knowledge On Linguistic Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be useful to devise formulae or cookbook-level 'preprocessing' steps that are tailored to agglutinating languages so as to obtain meaningful data not only in qualitative assessments, but also, moreover, in larger corpora so as to compute a sort of a semantic lexical diversity or an agglutinationcalibrated lexical diversity (cf. other variants [9,18]). Although we cannot possibly determine this here, it serves to explore this option for further investigation, for a possible chance to reuse the wealth of existing NLP tools.…”
Section: Lexical Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual notion of lexical diversity (including permutations [9]) and, similarly, word frequency profiling with the log likelihood [18], are not informative as measures for agglutinating languages. The amaphoyisa and imali were but two examples to illustrate the issue with nouns, where notably prepositions are merged with the noun, and bebengakangikhumbuli as illustrative for verbs, which contains also concords for subject, object, and others, such as aspect.…”
Section: Lexical Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O resultado da medição da DiL através da TTR pode ser expresso no intervalo de 0 e 1, ou em porcentagens. Isso significa que quanto maior o valor da TTR, mais diversificado será o vocabulário do escrevente (DeBoer, 2014).…”
Section: Investigação: Antecedentes E Conceitosunclassified
“…Esse decréscimo parece estar associado ao crescimento do número de tokens e types, visto que o crescimento do número de types não acompanhou o crescimento do número total de tokens, resultando em uma relação inversamente proporcional entre a DiL e o número de tokens. Alguns estudos sobre a DiL (Deboer, 2014) associam essa relação inversa à repetição do vocabulário funcional, e.g. preposições e artigos.…”
Section: Conclusãounclassified