2018
DOI: 10.1097/nna.0000000000000659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Clinical Practice Model's Strengths and Improvement Opportunities Using the Professional Practice Framework Assessment Survey

Abstract: OBJECTIVES The aims of this study are (1) to describe the division, organizational strengths, and improvement opportunities of self-reported behaviors indicative of the multidimensional construct of professional practice and (2) to understand demographic characteristics that contributed to these strengths and improvement opportunities. BACKGROUND Prior to implementing a system-wide interdisciplinary shared governance structure, ProHealth Care measured s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen studies measured the development and/or implementation and/or evaluation of a PPM (Arroyo‐Marlés et al, 2018 ; Bloemhof et al, 2021 ; Burke et al, 2018 ; Clavelle & Goodwin, 2016 ; Gentile & Marzinski, 2020 ; Glassman, 2016 ; Holskey & Rivera, 2020 ; Keleekai‐Brapoh & Toresco, 2020 ; Mensik et al, 2017 ; Murphy et al, 2018 ; Olender et al, 2020 ; Oommen et al, 2022 ; Qu et al, 2019 ; Robbins, 2019 ). Eight of the included studies were conducted in the United States of America (Burke et al, 2018 ; Clavelle & Goodwin, 2016 ; Gentile & Marzinski, 2020; Glassman, 2016 ; Holskey & Rivera, 2020 ; Keleekai‐Brapoh & Toresco, 2020 ; Mensik et al, 2017 ; Olender et al, 2020 ), one in Columbia (Arroyo‐Marlés et al, 2018 ), one in Ireland (Murphy et al, 2018 ), one in China (Qu et al, 2019 ), one in the Netherlands (Bloemhof et al, 2021 ), one in the Uinted Arab Emirates (Oommen et al, 2022 ) and one in Scotland (Robbins, 2019 ). The characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Fourteen studies measured the development and/or implementation and/or evaluation of a PPM (Arroyo‐Marlés et al, 2018 ; Bloemhof et al, 2021 ; Burke et al, 2018 ; Clavelle & Goodwin, 2016 ; Gentile & Marzinski, 2020 ; Glassman, 2016 ; Holskey & Rivera, 2020 ; Keleekai‐Brapoh & Toresco, 2020 ; Mensik et al, 2017 ; Murphy et al, 2018 ; Olender et al, 2020 ; Oommen et al, 2022 ; Qu et al, 2019 ; Robbins, 2019 ). Eight of the included studies were conducted in the United States of America (Burke et al, 2018 ; Clavelle & Goodwin, 2016 ; Gentile & Marzinski, 2020; Glassman, 2016 ; Holskey & Rivera, 2020 ; Keleekai‐Brapoh & Toresco, 2020 ; Mensik et al, 2017 ; Olender et al, 2020 ), one in Columbia (Arroyo‐Marlés et al, 2018 ), one in Ireland (Murphy et al, 2018 ), one in China (Qu et al, 2019 ), one in the Netherlands (Bloemhof et al, 2021 ), one in the Uinted Arab Emirates (Oommen et al, 2022 ) and one in Scotland (Robbins, 2019 ). The characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note from this present review is the need to continually develop and adapt a PPM to keep up to date with scientific changes (Arroyo-Marlés et al, 2018;Burke et al, 2018;Gentile & Marzinski 2020;Glassman, 2016;Holskey & Rivera, 2020;Keleekai-Brapoh & Toresco, 2020;Murphy et al, 2018;Qu et al, 2019). A PPM is considered the most recognizable symbol for nursing in an organization, and therefore, changes to nursing practice, both in the external and internal environments, should be represented within a model (Arroyo-Marlés et al, 2018;Glassman, 2016;Holskey & Rivera, 2020;Keleekai-Brapoh & Toresco, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations