2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45175-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Changes in Knowledge and Attitudes of Digital Library Users

Abstract: Medical digital libraries are essentially life-critical applications providing timely access for professionals and the public to current medical knowledge and practice. This paper presents a new methodology for evaluating the impact of the knowledge within a medical digital library on users by testing their knowledge improvements and attitude changes. Using pre and post-use questionnaires we tested the impact of a small medical information website acting as an interface to the National electronic Library for C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most radically, we could even ask whether use of a digital library actually increases knowledge. It is not clear what evidence exists that physical libraries increase users' knowledge, but the ambivalent findings of one study of digital libraries provide food for thought (Madle, Kostkova, Mani‐Saada, & Weinberg, 2003). If people with real‐world motivations use digital libraries to acquire knowledge upon which they need to act and, after doing so, they have less understanding of the facts than before they began, is there a fundamental problem with digital libraries, with the specific library design with which they interacted, or with the idea that more information contributes to better decision making?…”
Section: Social Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most radically, we could even ask whether use of a digital library actually increases knowledge. It is not clear what evidence exists that physical libraries increase users' knowledge, but the ambivalent findings of one study of digital libraries provide food for thought (Madle, Kostkova, Mani‐Saada, & Weinberg, 2003). If people with real‐world motivations use digital libraries to acquire knowledge upon which they need to act and, after doing so, they have less understanding of the facts than before they began, is there a fundamental problem with digital libraries, with the specific library design with which they interacted, or with the idea that more information contributes to better decision making?…”
Section: Social Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measuring knowledge and attitude changes of digital library online users should not be performed by asking them to recall if the library has ever had an impact on their knowledge or their work, as has been the case for most previous digital library impact evaluations [17], but by actually measuring their specific knowledge and attitude changes at the point of use in real-time, using pre-and post-questionnaires. This approach has been piloted with a small digital library in the healthcare domain where library users were asked a series of questions before using the library and then asked the same questions after using the library, showing positive changes in knowledge and attitude [18,19].…”
Section: Knowledge and Attitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…knowledge and attitudes, length of hospital stay, prescribing rates or patient satisfaction. These are approaches that have been mirrored in evaluations since the advent of digital libraries [18]. By contrast, one study did focus on the impact of performing Medline searches on actual outcomes to show that searches performed earlier in the patient's hospital stay were associated with lower costs, charges and length of stay than those whose searches were performed later [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web evaluations can involve many different research methods including weblog analysis and pre-and post-questionnaires to investigate learning and use of online resources [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%