2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the capability of walkability audit tools for assessing sidewalks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A walkability audit tool method was employed to collect the raw GIS data described in this article. In general, these tools are observational instruments and they are used to assess quantitatively and qualitatively deficiencies in the pedestrian environment and infrastructure [12] . Such an approach provides detailed data on microscale environmental factors that seemingly increase walking and physical activity behaviours [5] .…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A walkability audit tool method was employed to collect the raw GIS data described in this article. In general, these tools are observational instruments and they are used to assess quantitatively and qualitatively deficiencies in the pedestrian environment and infrastructure [12] . Such an approach provides detailed data on microscale environmental factors that seemingly increase walking and physical activity behaviours [5] .…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscale walkability approaches at the level of streetscapes have also been developed for evaluating walkability [22,23,24]. Objective measures have been predominantly used in walkability research by developing walkability audits [25][26] and indexes [27,28,29] that evaluate and score the conditions provided to pedestrians. Such objective measures have been supported in Geographic Information Systems [30][31], multi-criteria analysis [25,32], virtual technologies [29,33], Web-based services, such as WalkScore, among others.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedestrian facilities are infrastructure provided to enhance the pedestrian environment, to improve pedestrian mobility, safety, access, and comfort. For that reason, pedestrian facilities have been one of the most analysed factors, namely by considering the following criteria: the characteristics, maintenance and continuity of sidewalks [28], the presence of obstacles on sidewalks that creates discomfort and affects pedestrian safety [40]; slopes, as small positive increments in slopes decrease travel speeds and increase the energy and the effort required for walking [41][42]; the presence of trees and greenery that bring several environmental, safety and aesthetic benefits and encourage people to walk and the walking experience [25]; and street furniture that helps in creating a more pleasant and attractive walkable environment [43]. Finally, the characteristics of land use have been found to affect mode choice and walking [44].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent methods were put forward by Sousa et al (2017) and Corazza et al (2016). See also Aghaabbasi et al (2017) and references therein for other recent indicator proposals and Aghaabbasi et al (2018) for an evaluation of the capability of walkability audit tools to assess sidewalks. Performance indicators use different methodological approaches to yield a per-arc performance value for the pedestrian infrastructure considering different attributes such as e.g.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%