2015
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the ability of the pairwise joint site frequency spectrum to co-estimate selection and demography

Abstract: The ability to infer the parameters of positive selection from genomic data has many important implications, from identifying drug-resistance mutations in viruses to increasing crop yield by genetically integrating favorable alleles. Although it has been well-described that selection and demography may result in similar patterns of diversity, the ability to jointly estimate these two processes has remained elusive. Here, we use simulation to explore the utility of the joint site frequency spectrum to estimate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive selection may also affect estimation of multi-population demographic scenarios: though we did not examine this here, Mathew and Jensen recently showed that selective sweeps will impair parameter estimates for a two-population isolation-with-migration model (Mathew and Jensen 2015). Thus our results, combined with those of Mathew and Jenson (2015), Ewing and Jensen (2016), and Messer and Petrov (2013), strongly suggest that the problem of natural selection skewing demographic inference is a general one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Positive selection may also affect estimation of multi-population demographic scenarios: though we did not examine this here, Mathew and Jensen recently showed that selective sweeps will impair parameter estimates for a two-population isolation-with-migration model (Mathew and Jensen 2015). Thus our results, combined with those of Mathew and Jenson (2015), Ewing and Jensen (2016), and Messer and Petrov (2013), strongly suggest that the problem of natural selection skewing demographic inference is a general one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As a corollary to this, demographic estimation performed from regions of the genome at differing genetic distances from regions experiencing selection should recover different parameter estimates (Gazave et al 2014). Our results also motivate the challenging task of simultaneous estimation of parameters related to natural selection and demographic history (Eyre-Walker and Keightley 2009; Mathew and Jensen 2015;Sheehan and Song 2016). Until an approach to obtain accurate estimates of demographic parameters in the face of natural selection is devised, population size histories inferred from population genetic data sets from many species may remain substantially biased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These alternative modes of positive selection could skew demographic inferences in a different manner than what we have observed in this study. Positive selection may also affect estimation of multipopulation demographic scenarios: although we did not examine this here, Mathew and Jensen (2015) recently showed that selective sweeps will impair parameter estimates for a two-population isolationwith-migration model. Thus our results, combined with those of Mathew and Jenson (2015), Ewing and Jensen (2016), and Messer and Petrov (2013), strongly suggest that the problem of natural selection skewing demographic inference is a general one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Excoffier & Foll ; Naduvilezhath et al . ; Mathew & Jensen ) have enabled more accurate inference of demographic history, which can then be used as a null model when scanning for genomic targets of selection. As a result, substantial advances have been made in detecting genes contributing to phenotypic changes in populations that have undergone recent adaptation in the wild such as Drosophila , stickleback, mice and humans (e.g., Reusch et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although disentangling selection and demography remains difficult, the use of population-level, genomescale data from recently diverged natural populations can help to discern the relative impact of these factors. The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies together with new computational and statistical techniques to model demographic histories (Thornton & Andolfatto 2006;Gutenkunst et al 2009;Excoffier & Foll 2011;Naduvilezhath et al 2011;Mathew & Jensen 2015) have enabled more accurate inference of demographic history, which can then be used as a null model when scanning for genomic targets of selection. As a result, substantial advances have been made in detecting genes contributing to phenotypic changes in populations that have undergone recent adaptation in the wild such as Drosophila, stickleback, mice and humans (e.g., Reusch et al 2001;Ihle et al 2006;Domingues et al 2012;Linnen et al 2013) and during domestication (e.g., Doebley 2004;Pollinger et al 2005; reviewed in Stinchcombe & Hoekstra 2008;Ellegren & Sheldon 2008;Mackay et al 2009;Stapley et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%