1989
DOI: 10.1109/47.44536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating text quality: the continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0
8

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
99
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…No clear impression of the effect that thinking aloud has on the way in which forms are completed can be gained either from the literature on thinking aloud or from the interviews we conducted later with our subjects. Since the thinking-aloud method-whether or not on the basis of situation sketches-is increasingly being recommended as an aid in the development and revision of documents, validation research is urgently required [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No clear impression of the effect that thinking aloud has on the way in which forms are completed can be gained either from the literature on thinking aloud or from the interviews we conducted later with our subjects. Since the thinking-aloud method-whether or not on the basis of situation sketches-is increasingly being recommended as an aid in the development and revision of documents, validation research is urgently required [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception has to be made for feedback provided by reader-focused document evaluations methods (Schriver, 1989). However, in recent reviews of the applicabil ity of such methods, no attention is paid to the potential of these methods to detect cultural differences in the comprehensibility and acceptability of documents Schellens, 2000, 2001).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One standard method for determining what respondents take away from task descriptions is the think-aloud protocol (32)(33)(34). Respondents describe what comes into their minds as they read the task.…”
Section: Measuring Successmentioning
confidence: 99%