2020
DOI: 10.3390/hydrology7020021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating SWAT Model Performance for Runoff, Percolation, and Sediment Loss Estimation in Low-Gradient Watersheds of the Atlantic Coastal Plain

Abstract: With predicted alterations in climate and land use, managing water resources is of the utmost importance, especially in areas such as the United States (U.S.) Coastal Plain where extensive connections exist between surface and groundwater systems. These changes create the need for models that effectively assess shifting hydrologic regimes and, in that context, we examine the performance of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in a low-gradient, shallow-aquifer-dominated watershed of the U.S. Coastal Plain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the evaluation of developed model performance, it was learned that the range of NSE varied from 0.51 to 0.57 and 0.60 to 0.83 for daily and monthly scale, respectively. This range is quite similar or even better than the 0.69 to 0.75 (on a monthly scale) found by [34] for a Mediterranean agricultural watershed (2.07 km 2 ) in Spain, 0.73 (on a monthly scale) by AnnAGNPS found by [26] for a 289.3 km 2 watershed in Illinois, USA, 0.65 (on a monthly scale) by SWAT and 0.48 to 0.58 (on a monthly scale) by AnnAGNPS found by [36] for a Mediterranean watershed (506 km 2 ) in Southern Italy, 0.53 (on a daily scale) by SWAT found by [67] for a large 1110 km 2 agricultural watershed in southwest France, 0.67 to 0.84 (on a monthly scale; calibration phase) found by SWAT for a large 4000 km 2 watershed in the North Carolina coastal plain [68], and the 0.53 to 0.62 (on a daily scale) found by SWAT for two watersheds in a semiarid region of Iraq [69]. Even, if we look at the value of R 2 from our study, it ranged from 0.54 to 0.66 (daily) and 0.64 to 0.86 (monthly).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…After the evaluation of developed model performance, it was learned that the range of NSE varied from 0.51 to 0.57 and 0.60 to 0.83 for daily and monthly scale, respectively. This range is quite similar or even better than the 0.69 to 0.75 (on a monthly scale) found by [34] for a Mediterranean agricultural watershed (2.07 km 2 ) in Spain, 0.73 (on a monthly scale) by AnnAGNPS found by [26] for a 289.3 km 2 watershed in Illinois, USA, 0.65 (on a monthly scale) by SWAT and 0.48 to 0.58 (on a monthly scale) by AnnAGNPS found by [36] for a Mediterranean watershed (506 km 2 ) in Southern Italy, 0.53 (on a daily scale) by SWAT found by [67] for a large 1110 km 2 agricultural watershed in southwest France, 0.67 to 0.84 (on a monthly scale; calibration phase) found by SWAT for a large 4000 km 2 watershed in the North Carolina coastal plain [68], and the 0.53 to 0.62 (on a daily scale) found by SWAT for two watersheds in a semiarid region of Iraq [69]. Even, if we look at the value of R 2 from our study, it ranged from 0.54 to 0.66 (daily) and 0.64 to 0.86 (monthly).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To obtain adequate CORN yields under changing climatic conditions, it is necessary either to change the sowing and harvesting dates for corn seed germination under conditions where the soil temperature is around 10 • C or to plant an appropriate corn type that is resistant to severe and mild water stress. Although the limited availability of data on factors such as water quality, crop yields, etc., can lead to uncertainties in model results and overconfidence in the predicted impacts of climate change on streamflow, nitrogen loads, and crop yields, SWAT is able to demonstrate good model performance in the ungauged catchments [63,81,82]. According to Hoang et al 2019 study [83], the integration of the water quality model QUAL2K and SWAT shows good results for model performance in the case of gaps in water quality data.…”
Section: Crop Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in SWAT models, the representation of the water table attributes and position tends to be inadequate. As a result, the parameters controlling shallow groundwater structure will have a large source of uncertainty associated with them [48]. A more discrete spatial representation of the aquifer characteristics and groundwater systems within sub-watersheds may increase the model accuracy.…”
Section: Hydrological Behavior Of the Watershedmentioning
confidence: 99%