2021
DOI: 10.4018/jgim.285585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Sustainable Development of Land Resources in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China

Abstract: The Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) is one of the most economically active regions in China, where an imbalance between the demand for land and the non-renewable is increasingly prominent. We present the patterns of land use in the YREB, then construct an evaluation index based on the Pressure-State-Response model. The TOPSIS model is used to evaluate sustainable land development in the YREB, and the spatial deductive characteristics of sustainable development levels are analyzed using three aspects: global… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach enhanced our understanding regarding the relation between urban land use and ecology in a more comprehensive manner. The findings indicate that during the sample period, the spatial disparity in LUEE among urban agglomerations in the YRB decreased over time, aligning with the conclusions of Sun et al [88].…”
Section: Analysis Of Spatio-temporal Characteristics Of Luee In the Yrbsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This approach enhanced our understanding regarding the relation between urban land use and ecology in a more comprehensive manner. The findings indicate that during the sample period, the spatial disparity in LUEE among urban agglomerations in the YRB decreased over time, aligning with the conclusions of Sun et al [88].…”
Section: Analysis Of Spatio-temporal Characteristics Of Luee In the Yrbsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Referring to previous studies, we selected a total of 22 indicators from the production, living, and ecology aspects, with cropland area, grass area, ecological service value, and water area as negative indicators and the rest as positive indicators. Positive indicators indicate that the greater the indicator, the higher the land pressure; negative indicators indicate that the greater the indicator, the lower the land pressure (Jiang et al, 2021; Lu et al, 2022; Sun et al, 2022; Yang, Bao, & Liu, 2020; Yang, Song, & Lu, 2020). Table S2 provides comprehensive explanations of the data sources used for the various study objectives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive indicators indicate that the greater the indicator, the higher the land pressure, negative indicators indicate that the greater the indicator, the lower the land pressure Jiang et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2022;Sun et al, 2022). Table S1 provides comprehensive explanations of the data sources used for the various study objectives.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%