Evaluating Successful Livelihood Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change in Southern Africa

Abstract

ABSTRACT. This paper examines the success of small-scale farming livelihoods in adapting to climate variability and change. We represent adaptation actions as choices within a response space that includes coping but also longer-term adaptation actions, and define success as those actions which promote system resilience, promote legitimate institutional change, and hence generate and sustain collective action. We explore data on social responses from four regions across South Africa and Mozambique facing a variety of climate risks. The analysis suggests that some collective adaptation actions enhance livelihood resilience to climate change and variability but others have negative spillover effects to other scales. Any assessment of successful adaptation is, however, constrained by the scale of analysis in terms of the temporal and spatial boundaries on the system being investigated. In addition, the diversity of mechanisms by which rural communities in southern Africa adapt to risks suggests that external interventions to assist adaptation will need to be sensitive to the location-specific nature of adaptation.

Exploring the role of social capital in influencing knowledge flows and innovation in smallholder farming communities in the Caribbean

“…Recognizing the limitations in the existing agricultural extension services in Saint Lucia, we suggest that such interpersonal networks provide a potentially powerful and adaptive mechanism through which to interact with smallholder farmers and ensure better-targeted interventions. Previous research by Osbahr et al (2010) evaluated four agricultural development projects in southern Africa and revealed the important use of interpersonal networks as platforms from which to build more formal organizations (maize collectives). This suggests that by better linking formal and informal interactions, governments may be able to foster more decentralized and synergistic knowledge production and exchange at minimal additional cost (see also Mikulcak et al 2015;Rahman et al 2015).…”

Differential livelihood adaptation to social-ecological change in coastal Bangladesh

“…The term 'differential livelihood adaptation', as used in this study, closely relates to the concepts of 'divergent adaptation' (Snorek et al 2014), 'response space' (Osbahr et al 2010) and 'adaptation pathway' (Wise et al 2014;Haasnoot et al 2013)-all of which conceptualise adaptation as a localised, complex and dynamic process, framed by the social, political and institutional dynamics as well as power, knowledge and values/interests across multiple scales. Households operate within a shared response space, characterised by adaptive and maladaptive spaces-the boundaries between which are changing over time, due to changes in bio-physical, socioeconomic and institutional context.…”

How Can Local Governance Systems Strengthen Community Resilience? A Social-Ecological Systems Approach

“…This polycentricism in institutional arrangements (i.e., multiple sources of decision making) is needed to address complex problems (Biggs et al, 2015;Osbahr, Twyman, Adger, & Thomas, 2010). Similarly, in a risk governance system connections between institutions across scales is thought to improve communities' resilience to shocks and stresses (Twigg et al, 2013), by helping to ensure resources and information are channelled to the local level effectively (Nelson, Adger, & Brown, 2007) and lessons from local level risk management can inform higher level policies (Wilkinson, 2013).…”