2015
DOI: 10.1109/jdt.2014.2384531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Subjective Impressions of Quality Controlled 3D Films on Large and Small Screens

Abstract: Evaluating subjective impressions of quality controlled 3D films on large and small screens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment method of visual fatigue is becoming a hot topic in the field of display quality evaluation [2], to solve such problems, it is necessary to find a suitable indicator for evaluating the effect of stereoscopic displays on human vision. 3D visual fatigue has already been studied using questionnaires, CFF and ACC in [3][4][5][6]. However, subjective measurement may be biased by viewers' past experience and current state of mind, visual function-based measurement requires large devices and optometric measurements cannot be recorded in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment method of visual fatigue is becoming a hot topic in the field of display quality evaluation [2], to solve such problems, it is necessary to find a suitable indicator for evaluating the effect of stereoscopic displays on human vision. 3D visual fatigue has already been studied using questionnaires, CFF and ACC in [3][4][5][6]. However, subjective measurement may be biased by viewers' past experience and current state of mind, visual function-based measurement requires large devices and optometric measurements cannot be recorded in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual fatigue is usually assessed by exploiting questionnaires gathering users' evaluations before and after the experiment [10], [11]. Nevertheless, questionnaires are naturally biased by inter-subject variability in the answers, due to the subject's mood at the time of the experiment as well as to their past experience or to their level of understanding of the questions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%