2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating STZ-Induced Impaired Wound Healing in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Staphylococcus aureus-specific biofilms into splinted excisional wounds delays epithelialization and wound closure in db/db mice (Nguyen et al, 2013), whereas wounds in aged db/ db mice heal with reduced stiffness and breaking load, along with reduced deposition of granulation tissue that is independent of glycemia (Brem et al, 2007). Ansell et al (2018) discuss the lack of experimental details reported in the literature when the STZ model is used, particularly with regard to the impact of duration of diabetes on healing outcome. They examine this model more closely by evaluating Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Staphylococcus aureus-specific biofilms into splinted excisional wounds delays epithelialization and wound closure in db/db mice (Nguyen et al, 2013), whereas wounds in aged db/ db mice heal with reduced stiffness and breaking load, along with reduced deposition of granulation tissue that is independent of glycemia (Brem et al, 2007). Ansell et al (2018) discuss the lack of experimental details reported in the literature when the STZ model is used, particularly with regard to the impact of duration of diabetes on healing outcome. They examine this model more closely by evaluating Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Assessment of gross wound size, planimetry, presence of the scab, re-epithelialization by histology, tensile/breaking strength, tensile stiffness, fibrosis, cellular infiltrate, microbial composition, inflammation, granulation tissue formation, and transcutaneous water loss are among the methods used to evaluate wound healing. Even if one chooses to ignore the obvious structural differences between human and mouse skin ( Figure 1) and does not take into account additional biological variables (age, sex, microbiome, location), it becomes clear that reproducibility and extrapolation of data, as well as comparison among published studies, is very challenging, especially when details of experimental design are missing (Ansell et al, 2018). As an example, recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB, which has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, shows variable efficacy in preclinical murine models, ranging from improved wound closure of 1.5-cm excisional diabetic mouse wounds (Greenhalgh et al, 1990), to significant increase of granulation tissue without improvement in the time to wound closure (and only in the 1.5-cm but not in 0.6-to 1.0-cmediameter excisional wounds) (Chan et al, 2006), to no effect on reepithelialization in a murine splinted diabetic wound model (Park et al, 2014).…”
Section: Murine Models Of Wound Healingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although wound re‐epithelialization was delayed in R‐Ras KO at day 2, we show no difference in all other time points during wound healing process between WT and R‐Ras KO mice, indicating that R‐Ras does not play a significant role in skin wound healing. Despite employing both excision and splint wound models, one needs to acknowledge that rodent wound models do not perfectly recapitulate human wound healing . Thus, certain limitations are warranted for the interpretation of our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the studies on animal models haven’t historically taken into account additional important variables such as animal age, sex, microbiome, diabetes, or length of underlying condition into their study design [2629]. These factors have been shown to impact healing in the models, and may contribute to the poor translation of preclinical animal trials to human trials [26, 29, 27]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%