2014
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2014.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating spatial policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 The report also points to a number of concrete actions that policy makers can take in order to get the most from evaluation of regional or urban policies. These messages also reflect the conclusions by Gibbons, Nathan, and Overman (2014) and the reviews of the WWG. The interested reader may also refer to Oldsman (2004) for a complementary set of policy recommendation in the field of innovation policy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 The report also points to a number of concrete actions that policy makers can take in order to get the most from evaluation of regional or urban policies. These messages also reflect the conclusions by Gibbons, Nathan, and Overman (2014) and the reviews of the WWG. The interested reader may also refer to Oldsman (2004) for a complementary set of policy recommendation in the field of innovation policy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, targeted or ad-hoc definitions of spatial units might have some shortcomings for policy analysis. As Gibbons, Nathan and Overman (2014) point out, often policy makers are interested in knowing how "their" city or region is performing. Furthermore, the spatial scale at which future policies will be implemented will still be the administrative one.…”
Section: The Choice Of the Right Spatial Unit And Of The Right Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the argument is made that contradictory (spatial) effects manifest from 'spatially blind' policies. In England, for example, such perverse spatial outcomes from spatially blind investment and policy decisions has led to mounting calls for a national spatial plan (Wong, 2012), which may assist in the evaluation of spatial policies (Gibbons et al, 2014). In light of the above critiques relating to peoplecentred models, active regional development and space-blind policies, the next section considers place-based approaches to local and regional development.…”
Section: Spatially Blind Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that these results have important implications for policy-makers willing to improve the design and the efficiency of such schemes. Finally, many issues arise with the quantitative evaluation of enterprise zone programs, and methods to address them have been recently refined (Gibbons et al, 2014). We develop an estimation strategy that follows closely establishment location behavior, and allows to control finely for endogeneity issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%