2022
DOI: 10.1111/apce.12368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating social impact in practice: Constructing a response to institutional demand in a French nonprofit organization

Abstract: Research into nonprofit organizations' (NPOs) social impact-and especially how it is measured-has drawn attention in recent years. Social impact evaluation (SIE) is a form of institutional pressure exerted on NPOs and can be considered a rational myth (Meyer & Rowan, 1977). In this article, we focus on the organizational response to this institutional demand and use the theoretical framework of inhabited institutions (Hallett & Ventresca, 2006) to analyze the local dynamics of SIE implementation.The research i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reasonable and balanced assessment seems more relevant for these organizations. This study invites stakeholders to consider the organization's capacities before demanding highly accomplished evaluation methods (Ebrahim and Rangan 2014) and to adapt the evaluation to each organization (Kleszczowski and Raulet‐Croset 2022). The counterpart for NPOs remains the development of their governance and the strengthening of the relationship with them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reasonable and balanced assessment seems more relevant for these organizations. This study invites stakeholders to consider the organization's capacities before demanding highly accomplished evaluation methods (Ebrahim and Rangan 2014) and to adapt the evaluation to each organization (Kleszczowski and Raulet‐Croset 2022). The counterpart for NPOs remains the development of their governance and the strengthening of the relationship with them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%