2012 IEEE 24th International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2012.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Simple Fully Automated Heuristics for Adaptive Constraint Propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pruning can be weaker than the full version, but the computational effort can be significantly reduced. In Stergiou (2008) and Paparrizou and Stergiou (2012), heuristics allow the solver to dynamically select AC or a stronger level of consistency (maxRPC) during the search depending on the variable/constraint. The approaches are based on the clustering effect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pruning can be weaker than the full version, but the computational effort can be significantly reduced. In Stergiou (2008) and Paparrizou and Stergiou (2012), heuristics allow the solver to dynamically select AC or a stronger level of consistency (maxRPC) during the search depending on the variable/constraint. The approaches are based on the clustering effect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to offer a more interesting comparison, we adapted the finite-domain oriented mechanism proposed in Stergiou (2008Stergiou ( , 2012 to interval-based contractors.…”
Section: A Stergiou-based Adaptive Contractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its performance is unpredictable and can differ widely on similar instances. Further, maintaining a given consistency property during search has become a common practice [13,22,30,42,43] and new strategies for dynamically switching between consistency algorithms are being investigated [1][2][3]9,15,16,18,25,29,41,46,48]. While consistency algorithms can dramatically reduce the size of the search space, their impact on the CPU cost of search can vary widely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choosing the right level of local consistency for solving a problem requires finding a good trade-o↵ between the ability of this local consistency to remove inconsistent values, and the cost of the algorithm that enforces it. The works of [Ste08] and [PS12] suggest to take advantage of the power of strong propagation algorithms to reduce the search space while avoiding the high cost of maintaining them in the whole network. These methods result in a heuristic approach based on the monitoring of propagation events to dynamically adapt the level of local consistency (arc consistency or max restricted path consistency) to individual constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%