Evaluating Similarities and Differences between Machine Learning and Traditional Statistical Modeling in Healthcare Analytics

Abstract

Data scientists and statisticians are often at odds when determining the best approaches and choosing between machine learning and statistical modeling to solve their analytical challenges and problem statements across industries. However, machine learning and statistical modeling are actually more closely related to each other rather than being on different sides of an analysis battleground. The decision on which approach to choose is often based on the problem at hand, expected outcome(s), real world application of the results and insights, as well as the availability and granularity of data for the analysis. Overall machine learning and statistical modeling are complementary techniques that are guided on similar mathematical principles, but leverage different tools to arrive at insights. Determining the best approach should consider the problem to be solved, empirical evidence and resulting hypothesis, data sources and their completeness, number of variables/data elements, assumptions, and expected outcomes such as the need for predictions or causality and reasoning. Experienced analysts and data scientists are often well versed in both types of approaches and their applications, hence use best suited tools for their analytical challenges. Due to the importance and relevance of the subject in the current analytics environment, this chapter will present an overview of each approach as well as outline their similarities and differences to provide the needed understanding when selecting the proper technique for problems at hand. Furthermore, the chapter will also provide examples of applications in the healthcare industry and outline how to decide which approach is best when analyzing healthcare data. Understanding of the best suited methodologies can help the healthcare industry to develop and apply advanced analytical tools to speed up the diagnostic and treatment processes as well as improve the quality of life for their patients.

Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Obesity Research: Scoping Review of Methodologies

“…Despite the poorly defined domain and overlapping algorithms, at least 2 distinctions could be made between modern AI (ie, ML and DL) and other statistical methods. In terms of aims, the objective of AI models and their evaluation metrics predominantly concern prediction precision (often at the cost of compromising interpretability as models become complex) [78,79]. By contrast, conventional statistical approaches usually attempt to reveal relationships among variables (statistical inference) and focus on model interpretability [80].…”

Application of artificial intelligence in trauma orthopedics: Limitation and prospects

“…Even in orthopedic surgery, a field that largely relies on technical devices and imaging modalities, AI use is not limited to fracture detection and surgical robots in the operating room. Predictive modeling in traditional statistical modeling is based on known underlying structures and various hypotheses, but this is not the case for ML[ 31 ], which makes ML-based predictive models more efficient. We will review some of the predictive applications of ML in trauma orthopedics.…”