2022
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Signs of Pulmonary Hypertension on Computed Tomography and Correlating With Echocardiography: A Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract: Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a threatening condition, and it is far more common than previously assumed, especially after the COVID pandemic. Its outcome is not good; if detected late, and can lead to right ventricular failure, which can be fatal. Our goal was to evaluate CT signs of PH, correlate them with echocardiography, and identify the cut-off values of these signs in our population.Method: In this study, 160 patients having both CT and echocardiography with a maximum gap of one month wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A direct comparison of the diagnostic significance and agreement of PA, LPA, and RPA with respect to different sPAP values provides a superiority of the PA diameter compared with both pulmonary arteries not only with respect to AUROC results but also with respect to correlation analyses. These results were almost congruent with a work of Rehman et al [ 20 ], who compared the respective echocardiographic sPAP values with the PA, RPA, and LPA diameters. This showed very weak correlations between the sPAP and the right (r = 0.155) and left pulmonary artery (r = 0.138) diameters and a weak correlation between the sPAP and PA diameters (r = 0.316).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A direct comparison of the diagnostic significance and agreement of PA, LPA, and RPA with respect to different sPAP values provides a superiority of the PA diameter compared with both pulmonary arteries not only with respect to AUROC results but also with respect to correlation analyses. These results were almost congruent with a work of Rehman et al [ 20 ], who compared the respective echocardiographic sPAP values with the PA, RPA, and LPA diameters. This showed very weak correlations between the sPAP and the right (r = 0.155) and left pulmonary artery (r = 0.138) diameters and a weak correlation between the sPAP and PA diameters (r = 0.316).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, although not statistically significant, the results for the 4 year mortality rate came exceedingly close to but did not reach the threshold of significance (p = 0.051). Regarding the diagnostic value of the PA diameter for PH, when using sPAP as a reference, we arrived at higher AUC values (AUC = 0.658-0.681) compared with a previous study by Rehman et al (AUC = 0.591) [17]. The PA/BSA cut-off of 15.7 mm/m 2 was determined in the same fashion.…”
Section: Pa and Pa/bsa: Overall Differences With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 65%