2015
DOI: 10.1002/jps.24504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Scale-Up Rules of a High-Shear Wet Granulation Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relative swept volume is a measure of the energy input efficiency of the impeller blade on the powder and related to densification work of the wet mass. Despite these granulator design differences, we have achieved comparable granule attributes by using a scaling index of 0.8, which is consistent with previously reported successful outcomes 15,24,25 .…”
Section: Comparison Of Granules From Diosna and Fielder Granulatorssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This relative swept volume is a measure of the energy input efficiency of the impeller blade on the powder and related to densification work of the wet mass. Despite these granulator design differences, we have achieved comparable granule attributes by using a scaling index of 0.8, which is consistent with previously reported successful outcomes 15,24,25 .…”
Section: Comparison Of Granules From Diosna and Fielder Granulatorssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Only minor variations were observed between RC runs, and thus it can be concluded that feed rate and the intra-granular lubricant concentration did not exert any effect on the dissolution profile of tablets from the RC runs. Granule porosity has been found to correlate with the final blend compaction and tablet dissolution (Tao J, et al, 2015), which could explain the results. Furthermore, it can be concluded that the dissolved amount fulfilled the similarity requirements (EMA, 2010) in all runs.…”
Section: Dissolution Profilementioning
confidence: 76%
“…These approaches can be grouped in three categories depending on the process parameter or rate process chosen as a mean to scale up: Based on Impeller power: Scale up using the impeller power as the granulation end point measurement, either determined through impeller workload inflection 7,8 or calculated from power number correlation 9 Based on Impeller speed: Scaling the impeller speed based on constant Froude number or constant tip speed or constant shear stress 10,11 Regime map approaches: Scale up using granule nucleation rate 12 or granule growth rate 13 …”
Section: Scale Up Approaches Based On Dimensionless Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hassanpour et al 15 was unsuccessful in using constant Froude number in scaling a granulation process between 1 and 50 L since the granule strengths across the scales were not comparable. On the other hand, Tao et al 10 produced granules with comparable compaction and dissolution behavior across different scales using a constant Froude number approach. Existence of such discrepancies in literature suggest that most of these rules are not universally applicable and no such structured guidance exist on how to choose a suitable one.…”
Section: Scale Up Approaches Based On Dimensionless Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%