2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-012-0532-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating routing metric composition approaches for QoS differentiation in low power and lossy networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Node based primary routing metrics are Hop count, Residual energy and RSSI. Many RPL protocol implementations followed by the routing metrics such as Hop count and expected transmission count (ETX) [11]. Using Hop count as a primary routing metric, which minimize the number of node present in the route and minimize the node depletion energy.…”
Section: Primary Routing Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Node based primary routing metrics are Hop count, Residual energy and RSSI. Many RPL protocol implementations followed by the routing metrics such as Hop count and expected transmission count (ETX) [11]. Using Hop count as a primary routing metric, which minimize the number of node present in the route and minimize the node depletion energy.…”
Section: Primary Routing Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-avoidance of loops is another area of concern as this can also lead directly to high energy consumption when not implemented correctly. Karkazis et al [14] use simulation to test the effects of combining primary and composite routing metrics, and propose a set of complex formulae to implement this. The result is a successful convergence to optimal loop-free paths within an LLN using the RPL protocol [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the Objective Function (OF) that defines how routing metrics are used to compute the Rank. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the operation of a WSN when the adopted routing metric is the Hop Count (HC) or its combination with Packet Forwarding Indicator (PFI) which reveals the trust of a node on its neighbor, according to [4].…”
Section: The Implemented Routing Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of this section is the validation of the routing solutions (proposed in [4]) through the comparison of results obtained from the experimental setup of real-life nodes with results obtained from the simulation platform.…”
Section: Performance Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation